20-01-2020, 12:07 AM
(19-01-2020, 10:01 AM)karlmarx Wrote: If his point is that interest rates will eventually recover from its lows, it is well taken. But I'm not convinced that his argument supports his conclusion.
These are massive topics/issues that he is discussing. I'm not sure if the writer has bitten off more than he can chew, by trying to connect multiple global/local phenomenons with simple reasoning and plenty of unexamined assumptions. For example:
an initial swing to the left is bad for supply but good for demand - particularly coming from a point of significant inequality - and in the initial stages of a swing left, the rich get poorer but the poor and middle class get richer, as wealth and income is redistributed from the rich to the poor.
The task of connecting multiple phenomenons and arriving at a convincing conclusion -- if it is indeed intended to convince the author and/or the reader -- is probably best undertaken over a longer piece, and with supporting data. I don't recall anybody who can claim to be able to produce a convincing and data-supported text, detailing how present conditions/phenomenons will lead to a certain future economic outcome.
Nevertheless, I do think it is good exercise for the brain when one makes such an attempt. If you can predict marco economic outcomes, surely you will be able to tell which industries/companies will do well in the future?
I personally don't make such attempts. It consumes way too much effort and the findings may only be mildly helpful in achieving better investment outcomes, at best. In the end, the author recognises the futility of macroeconomic crystalball gazing and makes what is perhaps the most useful point in the essay:
I feel very fortunate that my investment approach does not rely on predicting macro outcomes such as these, or variables such as interest rates. I plan to keep doing what I always do - find stocks trading at low prices relative to their likely future distributable cash flow. A margin of safety, and low prices/rapid cash flow payback is always the best hedge against an uncertain future.
In short, reincarnation of Buffetology.