Macquarie International Infrastructure Fund

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
THE PROPOSED DIVESTMENT OF TAIWAN BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS AND THE PROPOSED OFFERING AND LISTING OF ASIAN PAY TELEVISION TRUST
Luck & Fortune Favours those who are Prepared & Decisive when Opportunity Knocks
------------ 知己知彼 ,百战不殆 ;不知彼 ,不知己 ,每战必殆 ------------
Reply
If the IPO listing on SGX is successful as "APTT", shall we opt for cash of $0.408 (aka is value correct?) or shares?
It seems that after listing as "APTT" , the mother company is still "Macqurie Group limited? So mother likes this child very much? Why?
Vested leh!
WB:-

1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.

Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.

NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Reply
hi uncle temperament,

my thoughts on this here > http://www.investmentmoats.com/money-man...rust-aptt/

the key thing is that the sell price is less than purchase price. and that potential acquirers actually value them as less than that.

its either miif overpaid last time, people dont realize the value or that the prospect of TBC isnt really that good.

folks familiar with Taiwan may value add here.
Dividend Investing and More @ InvestmentMoats.com
Reply
(04-04-2013, 09:28 AM)Drizzt Wrote: hi uncle temperament,

my thoughts on this here > http://www.investmentmoats.com/money-man...rust-aptt/

the key thing is that the sell price is less than purchase price. and that potential acquirers actually value them as less than that.

its either miif overpaid last time, people dont realize the value or that the prospect of TBC isnt really that good.

folks familiar with Taiwan may value add here.
Ya lol! if listing successful still Under Macquarie Group limited. And why no private buyer if TBC is value for money?
Thanks Drizzt.
WB:-

1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.

Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.

NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Reply
i am always under the impression tbc is a pretty good asset. the ebitda is consistent. its the financial engineering that poses more problem

but anyone in taiwan know if satellite tv is more popular
Dividend Investing and More @ InvestmentMoats.com
Reply
Proposed Minimum Disposal Price: $469.5 million (this is after transaction cost and 31 Dec 2012 valuation is $494.2 million)
Proportionate Debt: $473.5 million
EV: $943 million
Gearing: 50.2%
EBITDA: $93.4 million
EV / EBITDA: 10.1x

(Not Vested)
Disclaimer: Please feel free to correct any error in my post. I am not liable for anything. Do your own research and analysis. I do NOT give buy or sell calls and stock tips. Buy and sell at your risk. I am not a qualified financial adviser so I do not give any advice. The postings reflects my own personal thoughts which may or may not be accurate.
Reply
I'm more interested to know what price they will sell CXP - vested in PUC.
Reply
(04-04-2013, 09:28 AM)Drizzt Wrote: the key thing is that the sell price is less than purchase price. and that potential acquirers actually value them as less than that.

its either miif overpaid last time, people dont realize the value or that the prospect of TBC isnt really that good.

Without any consideration of the quality of the asset and who got the valuation right/wrong, it can also be argued that buyers are also suffering from "anchoring bias" - Do note that MIIF is listed and TBC's valuations are updated on a quarterly basis. Therefore, a potential buyer's soliciting price can be affected by the knowledge of the valuation price in the results report, and there is the 'human bargaining tendency' to offer something below that.

But it does seem to indicate that the dim shareholder's hope of getting richer valuations from TBC (to compensate for potential lower valuations from CXP/HNE) are getting distant.......

(04-04-2013, 08:25 AM)Temperament Wrote: If the IPO listing on SGX is successful as "APTT", shall we opt for cash of $0.408 (aka is value correct?) or shares?

Looking at how some of the business trusts are performing and those that have delayed their IPOs (eg. Reliance's underwater cables), a MIIF investor who wants to continue to have their TBC fix, might be better off if they take the cash and subsequently wait for a better price after IPO....Big Grin
Reply
(04-04-2013, 03:00 PM)weijian Wrote:
(04-04-2013, 09:28 AM)Drizzt Wrote: the key thing is that the sell price is less than purchase price. and that potential acquirers actually value them as less than that.

its either miif overpaid last time, people dont realize the value or that the prospect of TBC isnt really that good.

Without any consideration of the quality of the asset and who got the valuation right/wrong, it can also be argued that buyers are also suffering from "anchoring bias" - Do note that MIIF is listed and TBC's valuations are updated on a quarterly basis. Therefore, a potential buyer's soliciting price can be affected by the knowledge of the valuation price in the results report, and there is the 'human bargaining tendency' to offer something below that.

But it does seem to indicate that the dim shareholder's hope of getting richer valuations from TBC (to compensate for potential lower valuations from CXP/HNE) are getting distant.......

(04-04-2013, 08:25 AM)Temperament Wrote: If the IPO listing on SGX is successful as "APTT", shall we opt for cash of $0.408 (aka is value correct?) or shares?

Looking at how some of the business trusts are performing and those that have delayed their IPOs (eg. Reliance's underwater cables), a MIIF investor who wants to continue to have their TBC fix, might be better off if they take the cash and subsequently wait for a better price after IPO....Big Grin
Maybe half cash, half shares? May be possible. But i think i will take cash 1st, talk later.
WB:-

1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.

Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.

NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Reply
Quote:Greater Execution Certainty

Any divestment which involves a change of control of TBC, including a trade sale, would require formal approvals from the Taiwanese regulatory authorities.

The Proposed Divestment would not require formal approvals from the Taiwan regulatory authorities as there is no change of control or owner of TBC, given the Trustee-Manager of APTT will continue to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macquarie Group Limited and Macquarie Group Limited will continue to hold an investment in TBC through APTT. As a result, the Proposed Divestment is expected to provide Shareholders with greater execution certainty.

http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/V...600434E34/$file/MIIFSGMCircular08042013.pdf?openelement [MIIF SGM Circular]

(Not Vested)
Disclaimer: Please feel free to correct any error in my post. I am not liable for anything. Do your own research and analysis. I do NOT give buy or sell calls and stock tips. Buy and sell at your risk. I am not a qualified financial adviser so I do not give any advice. The postings reflects my own personal thoughts which may or may not be accurate.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)