CapitaMalls Asia

[egghead]

68.8% as of today

Dealings Disclosure 23 Apr

[intellect]

68.8% as of today

Dealings Disclosure 23 Apr

Well, not going to sell my shares until they compulsory acquire them.

[opmi]

Minority shareholders got no conviction to hold one. Mostly defeatist mindset.

[greengiraffe]

CATHAY

SIAS: Minority interest addressed in CMA offer
It also says it is satisfied that there is independence in review of the offer

BYLYNETTE KHOO
lynkhoo@sph.com.sg @LynetteKhooBT
PRINT |EMAIL THIS ARTICLE
Capitalandpriv250414
Singapore's retail investor watchdog has weighed in on the heated debate surrounding CapitaLand's privatisation offer for CapitaMalls Asia (CMA) - PHOTO: CAPITALAND
SINGAPORE'S retail investor watchdog has weighed in on the heated debate surrounding CapitaLand's privatisation offer for CapitaMalls Asia (CMA).
The Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or SIAS, said yesterday it is satisfied that there is independence in the review of the offer by CMA and that "minority shareholder interest has been addressed sufficiently".
While some market observers have questioned if the offer for CMA is fair, David Gerald, president and chief executive of SIAS, pointed out that the offer price of $2.22 per share is at a premium - not a discount - to book value when its peers are trading below book value.
The nearest comparable company - Hong Kong-listed Hang Lung Properties, also a shopping mall player in China - is trading at 0.86 times price-to-book.
Mr Gerald said his press statement serves as a "guidance only to CMA's minority shareholders" in view of the comments made by Michael Dee, former regional CEO for Morgan Stanley and senior managing director at Temasek Holdings, against the offer.
SIAS has since been asked by some minority shareholders to provide a view on this issue, he told BT.
Criticisms of CapitaLand's offer for its 65.3 per cent subsidiary centred on whether it is fair for minority shareholders given its "paltry premium over the IPO price and book value multiple", in the words of Mr Dee.
In his analysis published in The Business Times, Mr Dee also flagged a "conflict of interest" given that the chairmen of CapitaLand and CMA are the same person and that five of 10 board members have direct ties to CapitaLand. As such, the majority of CMA's board should not be considered independent, Mr Dee argued.
But SIAS noted that all non-independent directors of CMA are excluded from evaluating the offer. The Independent Board Committee reviewing the deal consists of directors who are independent of CapitaLand and it is helmed by lead independent director, Loo Choon Yong, co-founder of the Raffles Medical Group.
"SIAS also understands that SIC (Securities Industry Council) has approved the independence of these directors. On this basis, SIAS is satisfied that there is independence in the review of the offer and minority shareholder interest has been addressed sufficiently," Mr Gerald said.
Declining to take a view on valuations, SIAS deems it more prudent for shareholders to wait for the IFA (independent financial advisor) report from Deutsche Bank to make an informed decision.
Analysts' reports have differed on their sum- of-parts valuations, with some analysts suggesting a higher valuation. But analysts all acknowledged that CMA has not traded above $2.22 in the past three years.
When CMA was listed in November 2009 at $2.12 apiece, it was debt-free and all the pre-IPO debt was assumed by CapitaLand, thus providing CMA with debt headroom for growth, SIAS pointed out.
Market conditions have also changed since CMA's listing. Religare Capital Markets said in a recent note that a potential China slowdown, lack of capital recycling direction, and competition from e-commerce would render CMA unable to provide the 20 per cent upside that the privatisation deal offers.
When approached by BT, CapitaLand's spokeswoman said the group is unable to comment during this offer period. "We advise CMA shareholders to wait for the IFA report. The Offer document will be sent next week."

[lonewolf]

Seriously? Why am I not surprised.

I wonder how many buddies are actually members of the SIAS.

Its hard to imagine that SIAS will side with minority shareholders when you get the feeling that the association is just a paper tiger anyway. And has SIAS ever stand up for minority shareholders? I certainly cant remember any but I may be having selective amnesia as far as SIAS is concerned.

Another 1,468,000 purchased at $2.12 but no change in the percentage. Still at 68.8%

DEALING DISCLOSURE 24 Apr

[egghead]

I am wondering if CapitaLand can legally buy from the open market at $2.22. My thinking is that since the offer of $2.22 is currently conditional upon getting 90% acceptance; whereas the buying in the market is unconditional (i.e. there is no way to return those bought from open market if 90% is not met eventually). Any comments?

[Temperament]

I am wondering if CapitaLand can legally buy from the open market at $2.22. My thinking is that since the offer of $2.22 is currently conditional upon getting 90% acceptance; whereas the buying in the market is unconditional (i.e. there is no way to return those bought from open market if 90% is not met eventually). Any comments?

i think once you sold your share in the market, you have got no claim to anything.

[CityFarmer]

I am wondering if CapitaLand can legally buy from the open market at $2.22. My thinking is that since the offer of $2.22 is currently conditional upon getting 90% acceptance; whereas the buying in the market is unconditional (i.e. there is no way to return those bought from open market if 90% is not met eventually). Any comments?

I am not sure which clause in Takeover code supporting it, but it is a common practice during GOs.

May be the lack of the conditional, doesn't make open market acquisition with the offered price, a special deal.

[egghead]

I'm just wondering if CapitaLand is willing to buy at $2.22 unconditionally from open market, why do they make the offer conditional in the first place?

Anyway, as you said, this looks like the normal GO practice.

[opmi]

I'm just wondering if CapitaLand is willing to buy at $2.22 unconditionally from open market, why do they make the offer conditional in the first place?

Anyway, as you said, this looks like the normal GO practice.

Can buy legally at offer price from open market.

The 90% condition only applies to the shares that are tendered to them.