This company has attracted the attention of a micro-cap investor:
https://themikrokap.substack.com/p/marina-mania
However, I think he is making some errors:
1. Lease Expiry in 2034
With lease expiry only 11 years away, the company has to hoard cash, to either fund the lease extension and improvements, or to fund construction of a new marina somewhere else.
Note that the default government policy is to allow leases to expire without renewal:
https://www.sla.gov.sg/properties/land-s...ase-policy
The marina should be zoned commercial, so most likely lease extension will be contingent on land use intensification i.e. more buildings.
One benchmark: Marina Bay Sands construction cost was $8bn, and the lease extension included a $4.5bn expansion.
The original marina cost was about $100m (lease $32.5m + buildings $64.8m).
If we assume a pro-rata requirement, then the company has to budget about $54m for lease extension and complex expansion.
2. Deferred Membership
This cannot be ignored when looking at the company's cash position. It is broadly similar to insurance float: The members gave the company an asset (money) for their membership and the company must create a corresponding liability (the deferred membership). Each year, some of this liability is amortised and recognized as revenue, against which the company charges its operating expenses. The deferred membership liability should terminate in 2034, along with the lease itself.
3. Cash Flow
Cash flow is overstated, because about $4m a year is non-cash recognition of deferred membership income, while the company pays out cash for operations.
At the same time, the depreciation of PPE cannot be added back to cash flow because this amount has to go into a "sinking fund" pool that will be needed to fund construction of additional buildings, whether onsite or at a new marina if the lease is not extended.
4. Sea Level Risk
This company has all of its eggs in one basket. If sea levels rise (or fall) a lot, the marina complex may have to be renovated or rebuilt. The historical cost of the buildings was $64.8m. Future replacement cost is undoubtedly higher. Essentially, if you own this company, you are short climate change.
The absolute worst case scenario would be (i) the company pays a handsome sum to renew the lease for another 30 years and adds some new buildings, then (ii) sea levels rise or fall rapidly soon after, to the point that the marina modification cost is uneconomic and the entire marina is written off.
I don't know of any insurer that will underwrite such a risk, so most likely the company - and therefore its shareholders - are bearing this risk. I say the same thing to friends about waterfront property - no matter how much you like it, don't buy it, at most just rent it if you must have the lifestyle.
Just an alert to "cheap stock" investors who might be attracted by the zero debt, high cash balance, low PE, high yield, pricing power etc.
YMMV.