1. placement in OM will be completed after OM shareholder meeting in Feb
2. non controlling stake will not contribute much to boustead accounting earnings (no equity accounting) and hence dependent on dividends for cashflow. Based on current state and commodity pricing, unlikely to see much dividends as well.
3. Stake in OM is a step for bigger things - BT speculated smelting plant
4. Be patient. Until the initial stake in OM is completed, the next stage of taking a direct stake in OM Sarawak cannot proceed
5. As a shrewed and extremely conservative company under FF, there is absolutely no reason to buy a non controlling, non equity accounting insignificant stake in a cyclical company for a relatively sizable outlay. In Boustead's history, an investment of this size has not be done. Rationale behind it is very significant.
6. If you bother to find out via all publicly announced info on OMH, Cahya Mata Sarawak levels, the present OMH placement is targeted at kick starting the smelting plant. Without which, OMH will face significant difficulties with a depressed operating environment to proceed with a highly lucrative investments. Hence taking the step to resolve liquidity crunch faced by OMH will paved way for progressive rollout of smelting project that media is clearly hinting Boustead is heading towards.
7. The smelting plant will add significant value to OMH and reduced the operating leverage (cyclical risks) of the miner/trader's - ie business risks profile.
8. All said, as with all mega projects. Until we tie down customers (which is targeted at min 60% of the total capacity) and initial teething problems, all projections remain on paper. Stable cashflow is likely at the earliest in 2015/16 (within 1 - 2 years of plant commencement)
(24-01-2012, 08:44 AM)freedom Wrote: I don't think Boustead is trying to take a stake in the Sarawak plant, Boustead probably is looking at to be a EPC contractor for works in Sarawak plant.
yes, it requires OM shareholders' approval.
Everything that is required for the construction of the plant has already been secured - there is nothing that Boustead will be involved in except for $$$$$
http://www.cmsb.com.my/index.php?option=...Itemid=150
Joint Venture between Samalaju Industries Sdn Bhd and OM Materials (S) Pte Ltd
Annual Report
Reference No CMS-11024-F98E7
Company Name: CAHYA MATA SARAWAK BERHAD
Stock Name: CMSB
Date Announced: 24/10/2011
Type: Reply to query
Reply to Bursa Malaysia's Query Letter - Reference ID: TE-111021-40725
Subject: JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN SAMALAJU INDUSTRIES SDN BHD AND OM MATERIALS (S) PTE LTD
Description: JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN SAMALAJU INDUSTRIES SDN BHD AND OM MATERIALS (S) PTE LTD
Query Letter content:
We refer to the Company's announcement dated 20 October 2011, in respect of the
aforesaid matter.
In this connection, kindly furnish Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad ("Bursa
Securities") with the following additional information for public release:-
1. The reasons for the increase in the estimated cost to USD500 million.
2. The breakdown of the estimated cost.
3. Whether any Raw Material Suppy Agreement has been entered into, including
the duration for the supply. If no, to state the expected date of the agreement
to be entered into.
4. The expected timeframe to conclude negotiations with the off-takers.
Please furnish Bursa Securities with your reply within one (1) market day from
the date hereof.
Yours faithfully
HENG TECK HENG
Head, Issuers
Listing Division
Regulation
IJ/TEK
c.c:- General Manager and Head, Market Surveillance, Securities Commission
(via fax)
Announcement Details/Table Section :
We refer to the Company’s announcement dated 20 October 2011 (Ref: CM-111020-45595) in relation to the above and Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad’s ("Bursa Securities") letter dated 21 October 2011 (Ref: TE-111021-40725) for additional information on the abovementioned matter.
The additional information requested is as follows:
1. The reason for the increase in the estimated cost to USD500million is shown below:
i. Additional Engineering, Procurement, Construction Management and Indirect Costs ("EPCM") USD9.2 million
ii. Insurance USD2 million
iii. Last Mile Electricity Connection USD3.8 million
iv. Conveyor Belt USD35 million
Total USD50 million
2. The break down of the estimated cost is shown below:
Items Estimated Cost (USD)
Building investment 137,384,400
Plant and Equipment 220,302,400
Consultancy fee 2,513,000
Engineering Design fee 3,300,000
EPCM and Indirect costs 25,000,000
Insurance 2,000,000
Last Mile Electricity Connection 3,800,000
Conveyor Belt 35,000,000
Land and land clearing cost 37,000,000
Contingency cost 33,700,200
Total Estimated Cost 500,000,000
3. Whether any Raw Material Supply Agreement has been entered into, including the duration for the supply. If no, state the expected date of the agreement to be entered into.
The parties are still negotiating on the terms of the Raw Material Supply Agreement, including the duration for the supply. Barring unforeseen circumstances, it is anticipated that the Raw Material Supply Agreement will be concluded by the first quarter of 2012.
4. The expected timeframe to conclude negotiations with the off-takers.
Barring unforeseen circumstances, it is anticipated that negotiations with off-takers will be concluded by the second quarter of 2012.
This announcement is dated 24 October 2011.