Posts: 377
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
6
(30-05-2012, 11:56 AM)money Wrote: (30-05-2012, 09:47 AM)propertyinvestor Wrote: (29-05-2012, 03:29 PM)Temperament Wrote: (29-05-2012, 03:08 PM)propertyinvestor Wrote: (29-05-2012, 02:44 PM)Temperament Wrote: Of course! Of course! The CHENG Fellows (maybe you are one of them) like to see that the price stays @1.3. Just like SAT is buying back their shares @ 2.6. 
Want to write a complain letter? I the we minority shareholders should do something about this unfair offer. I cant believe SIC approved the partial takeover offer! 
O. K. Since you are the 1st one to mention, you are now the natural "RED INDIAN CHIEF" GO on.....
How many shares you got? Need at least 5% of voting rights to sign on the letter.
my family and relatives have around 120 lots, almost insignificant, but if we all combine, we may stand a chance to exceed 5% i hope
u r toking abt 50mil worth of stocks or abt 40,000lots for 5%...
The thing about karma, It always comes around and bite you when you least expected.
Posts: 1,119
Threads: 16
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
0
Posts: 2,113
Threads: 19
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
5
you think why the Chengs want to have a partial offer to have statutory control over Wing Tai. So that they can ignore all those requests they don't like as they already have more than 50% of votes, such as your request to unlock value.
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
Or if time permit, we all can pool our money to buy more + canvassing all fund houses + Tom, Dick, Harry & Mary. Plus Anyone who wants to participate. i think this CHENG Fellows is BIG FISH EATING SMALL FISH. The question is how come SIC agreed?
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Posts: 1,119
Threads: 16
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
0
(30-05-2012, 01:46 PM)Temperament Wrote: Or if time permit, we all can pool our money to buy more + canvassing all fund houses + Tom, Dick, Harry & Mary. Plus Anyone who wants to participate. i think this CHENG Fellows is BIG FISH EATING SMALL FISH. The question is how come SIC agreed?
exactly, is SIC daft?
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
(30-05-2012, 02:33 PM)propertyinvestor Wrote: (30-05-2012, 01:46 PM)Temperament Wrote: Or if time permit, we all can pool our money to buy more + canvassing all fund houses + Tom, Dick, Harry & Mary. Plus Anyone who wants to participate. i think this CHENG Fellows is BIG FISH EATING SMALL FISH. The question is how come SIC agreed?
exactly, is SIC daft?
No. Only "Old Man" thinks Singaporeans are daft. Therefore anything or organisations directly or indirectly associated with "Old Man", think Singaporeans are. Really, i have never seen one successful protest organised by Singaporeans, for Singaporeans. That's why "Old Man" & Associates will always think Singaporeans are daft. But i think we have some hope from the better educated younger generation. At least we see we have one "GRC" under the opposition. Let's wait and see after "OLD MAN" era lol. Which will be very soon. i think it will be the next change in 2015/2016.
Why the SIC agrees with the CHENG Fellows ?
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Posts: 2,113
Threads: 19
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
5
30-05-2012, 03:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-05-2012, 03:05 PM by freedom.)
Independent Financial Adviser should issue a recommendation by end of next week. Maybe it won't recommend the partial offer.
Posts: 200
Threads: 2
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
4
It will be nuts for anyone to recommend accepting an offer at such a steep discount to NAV. Not to mention that there are so many positives happening at Wing Tai's subsidiaries which are not announced via SGX.
Posts: 11
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
0
(30-05-2012, 03:18 PM)sgpunter Wrote: It will be nuts for anyone to recommend accepting an offer at such a steep discount to NAV. Not to mention that there are so many positives happening at Wing Tai's subsidiaries which are not announced via SGX.
I won't accept the offer either.
I rather hold all 100% of my holdings at the current undervalued share price (hoping that it will rise in the near future) than make a small capital gain from the partial offer. If the Chengs to get 50% ownership, chances of attracting a predator becomes significantly slimmer. Also, rejecting the offer may force him to raise the offer price... afterall, the NAV has increased to circa $2.80
Vested.
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
In case the result is unconditional 15% sale to Cheng fellows, maybe we can buy some in the market to cover this 15% +-. Or wait for the trading of "Odd Lots" window period. Whichever you think is better. Or you can do both.
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
|
Homepage
PR Newswire
