SMEs want rules to ensure fair rents

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#1
SMEs want rules to ensure fair rents

Many attendees at forum looking to help in protecting growing firms
Published on Apr 30, 2014 1:21 AM
PRINT EMAIL

A Ya Kun Kaya Toast outlet in Singapore. Ya Kun International chief executive Marc Leoi said local SMEs need to be realistic and noted that rents for its branches in Hong Kong and China are sometimes higher than in Singapore. -- PHOTO: YA KUN

By Tee Zhuo

BOSSES of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) want better rules in place to ensure fairer rents and occupancy terms to help them battle soaring leasing costs.

A Singapore Business Federation (SBF) forum held last week found that 72 per cent of 180 attending business owners and leaders said they would either like to see legislation or a "fair consideration" lease framework enacted to reduce rent pressures and protect growing firms.

The call comes in a period of rising rents: A parliamentary response this month noted that one in 10 retail tenants has had increases of more than 50 per cent from January 2012 to May last year, although these tended to be for those renewing their leases or who had units in more attractive locations.

The forum ranked "land, space and rental" as the second most pressing concern after manpower.

Former MP Cynthia Phua, who is a member of SBF's SME committee, said firms in retail and the food and beverage industry are the hardest hit.

"(They) have a much higher occupation cost structure, are more sensitive to rental increases due to the higher impact on business cost," she added.

The SBF is exploring developing a standardised set of rental lease terms and will eventually pursue legislation.

It said the committee will work first with the Government to "promote transparency in rental costs and practices", for example, through publishing rental data.

SBF chief operating officer Victor Tay said the purpose of the framework was not to side with smaller firms against landlords.

"We want a balanced framework that does not short-change either side. We do have some of the big players in SBF as well," he added. The SBF counts real estate giants CapitaLand, Far East Organization and Keppel Land as members.

Firms at the forum shared "horror stories" of lease agreements biased towards the landlord.

One participant said his landlord included a clause asking for a 30 per cent cut of his gross turnover in addition to the base rental.

Another noted clauses that gave landlords the right to alter the boundaries of leased premises.

Mr Tay said Singapore has allowed market forces to determine rental rates up to now, "but land scarcity and only a few dominant market players means the playing field is not that level".

He noted that other developed economies, including Britain, Australia and South Korea, already have measures to protect tenants and small retailers. Britain has had a code for leasing business premises since 2007 in addition to a Landlord and Tenant Act enacted in 1954. The code, which includes checklists and model lease templates, was drafted as a joint voluntary agreement between the government, tenants and landlords.

Singapore does not have any specialised rules for this area other than general laws, such as those governing contracts.

But Mr Marc Leoi, chief executive of home-grown food and beverage chain Ya Kun International, thinks local SMEs need to be realistic.

"Afford what you can... many businesses get into situations where they actually cannot afford the rents," he said.

Rents for Ya Kun's branches in Hong Kong and China are sometimes even higher than in Singapore, he added.

"We don't sign every lease that comes to us."

teezhuo@sph.com.sg
Reply
#2
Will the suggestion to "nationalize" mall emerge, due to "outsize" profit from mall owners? Big Grin

It seems market forces failed pretty often in Singapore, and always seeking help from "ah gong" (government)

May be should add a topic to my reading list, is this a global trend, or just Singapore unique?
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Reply
#3
Mkt forces failed because PAP govt and GLCs crowded
out private enterprises. Civil servants with Iron rice bowls
had ivory tower mentality.
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
Reply
#4
At least SMEs can feedback to govt to demand for fair rental terms. Low/medium wage workers have no such channels. Even have, their feedback have fallen on death ears. The last election results finally made the govt listen to them, at least for now.
Reply
#5
Bad news for REITs I think, especially retail REITs. Guess there is a limit to how much they can push for rent reversion before the tenants start to push back.
Wonder what is the possibility of this developing into some rent control legislation...
Reply
#6
(02-05-2014, 10:23 AM)gzbkel Wrote: Bad news for REITs I think, especially retail REITs. Guess there is a limit to how much they can push for rent reversion before the tenants start to push back.
Wonder what is the possibility of this developing into some rent control legislation...

wont one. no rent control. Wont solve the problem.

the Govt 'por-business' stance will not allow that to happen..

better to give mandate to Temasek and GLCs to balance profit maximisation and sustainability of SME sector. A good example is the construction sector. Previously Govt awards to cheapest quotes so mostly foreigner won tenders. Which led to the hollowing out of local construction companies. Which in turns make the govt dependent on foreigners and local companies doing low skills jobs..

The PAP Govt should realise MNCs cannot create all the jobs. Globalisation cut both ways. If there is no vibrant SME sector to create diversity of jobs, the unemployment issue will come back and bite the PAP Govt in their ass.
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
Reply
#7
Agree, the chinese model makes more sense but taken to extreme can be unscrupulous.

You get MNC to come in mainly to learn their technology and craft. End game is to let the locals do it in future. The foreigners know it and come in with eyes open. That's the Chinese model.

Singapore mentality is way different since the days of JTC founding . We just aim to work for others. That's why even today we celebrate CEOs rather than Chairmans. End game is low entrepenuerial spirit and subservient economy, and hence the foreign talents policy. SME naturally would struggle in these type of policy environments. The model worked very well in industrial stage but will be detrimental in a post-industrial economy. Obviously the advantage of China over Singapore is that it has a huge domestic market which is why our models are not the same but it's also obvious we cannot remain the same.
Before you speak, listen. Before you write, think. Before you spend, earn. Before you invest, investigate. Before you criticize, wait. Before you pray, forgive. Before you quit, try. Before you retire, save. Before you die, give. –William A. Ward

Think Asset-Business-Structure (ABS)
Reply
#8
too much hike in the rentals is not good for the REITS in the long run as the businesses will become nonviable if rentals are too high leading to empty & non rented shops.
So any kind of control to prevent the rentals from running away too high will be good thing for the REITs in the long term but may cause there prices to drop sharply in the short term.
Reply
#9
It is impossible for rent to be affordable in our city state.
Much like COE, in this case, space will go to the highest bidder.
This in turn will favor businesses that is able to generate the highest return.
Space intensive, low value add, labor intensive business will be phased out.
It is the same for retail and all other tyres of commercial properties.

SMEs hoping to get help in filling their manpower/space needs are dreaming.
It wont happen.
Reply
#10
(02-05-2014, 03:14 PM)Big Toe Wrote: It is impossible for rent to be affordable in our city state.
Much like COE, in this case, space will go to the highest bidder.
This in turn will favor businesses that is able to generate the highest return.
Space intensive, low value add, labor intensive business will be phased out.
It is the same for retail and all other tyres of commercial properties.

SMEs hoping to get help in filling their manpower/space needs are dreaming.
It wont happen.

Why cannot? The Govt with Hydra-like heads (GLCs) are the biggest indu and commercial landlords in SG. The policy of 'highest price wins' can be tweaked to includes other national devt objectives like jobs creation and SME business formations. Can be done. Ai Mai Nia. I believe the policy direction already going in favor of the SME sector.

Just like to give another example of how screw up the 'highest bid wins' policy. Remember long time the mobile food carts next to Somerset idea was proposed by some guy. Instead of rewarding the idea originator, the Govt called for the tender and that guy was outbidded by other people can afford to pay the higher price.
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)