China's rare earths export cut raises trade concerns

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#1
Personal comments: Its true that China has cornered 95% of world rare earth materials global supply. Its also true that rare earth are highly needed in electronic stuffs like your iphone.

However the perception I am getting from friends around me is China has control over practically the world rare earth supply.
Not yet.

Rare earth is a term to describe various materials such as ... (go chk wikipedia cos they are too exotic to memorise Tongue). The interesting thing is, there are plenty of them left on earth crust, even in USA.

The problem is the commodities plants to mine them, to process & refine are mainly own by China. Iron ore exist on earth too. But we have to process it with coking coal to get steel out of it.

So there.. my limited knowledge on rare earth. Hope it clears some doubts about the evil communist China who wouldn't give anyone a change to own the next iphone 5. Big Grin


(Reuters) - China has raised fresh international trade concerns after slashing export quotas on rare earths minerals, risking action from the United States at the World Trade Organization.

China, which produces about 97 percent of the global supply of rare earth minerals, cut its export quotas by 35 percent for the first half of 2011 versus a year ago, saying it wanted to preserve ample reserves, but warned against basing its total 2011 export quota on the first half figures.

The U.S. Trade Representative's office was "very concerned" about China's export restraints on rare earths and had raised its concerns with China, a spokeswoman said on Tuesday.

A European Commission spokesman said the European Union "notes the latest quota figures and expects China to respect its recent assurance of a guarantee of rare earth supplies to Europe."

U.S. makers of high-tech products such as Apple Inc's iPads, along with Japanese companies have been scrambling to secure reliable supplies of the minerals outside of China as Beijing steadily reduces export allocations.

Japan's Sony Corp said China's move to cut export quotas was a hindrance to free trade and that it would work to reduce its reliance on Chinese supplies.

"At this point in time there is no direct impact on our company. But further restrictions could lead to a shortage of supply or rise in costs for related parts and materials," Sony said in an email statement in response to questions from Reuters. "We will watch the situation carefully."

Sony, maker of Bravia brand flat TVs, Vaio PCs and the PlayStation 3 videogame console, will look for ways to cut its use of rare earths, including developing alternative materials, Sony spokeswoman Ayano Iguchi said.

A BOON TO SOME

China's move, however, came as a shot in the arm for some companies.

Lynas Corp, which owns the world's richest known non-Chinese deposit of rare earths, jumped over 10 percent even though it will be at least a year before it is capable of mining any material from a new lode in Australia.

Other rare earths companies, including China Rare Earth Holding Ltd, Arafura Resources, Alkane Resources and Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd also gained between 8 percent 10 percent.

"Export quotas continue to be a tool for the Chinese government to limit the export of China's strategic resource,"

Lynas Executive Chairman Nick Curtis said in a statement.

"The growth in the Chinese domestic market coupled with a decrease in production of rare earths in China is a likely cause for the tightening of export regulations," said Curtis, whose company is aiming to start production in about a year and has already forged supply contracts with Japanese traders.

World demand for rare earths at present is about 110,000 tonnes a year, with China accounting for about 75 percent of total demand with the remainder split between Japan, the United States and Europe, in descending order.

Demand for rare earths is set to more than double to 250,000 tonnes by 2015, according to industry estimates.

"Concerned parties should not estimate full-year quotas for rare earth minerals just by looking at the first set of quotas," China's Ministry of Commerce said.

Final quotas will take into account domestic production and demand both at home and abroad, according to the ministry.

DEALS FOR SUPPLY

Prices have surged for these minerals, also used in making fluorescent light bulbs, since authorities in Beijing slashed their rare earth exports by 40 percent this summer, saying China needed them for its economic development.

Last week, Hitachi Metals Ltd signed a joint venture with U.S.-based Molycorp Inc to help ensure a steady supply -- an announcement that sent its shares up 15 percent in a single trading session.

That followed word earlier this month that Sumitomo Corp agreed to invest $130 million in Molycorp to secure a seven-year supply of the materials.

Since debuting in late July at $14, Molycorp's stock price has nearly quadrupled.

Molycorp owns a rare-earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, which is scheduled to resume production next year after a 10-year hiatus.

Japan's trade minister, Akihiro Ohata, told reporters on Tuesday he believed Japan would still be able to secure enough rare earth supplies in 2011 even after China's quota cuts, but said the situation would need further study.

Ohata's comment was based on the assumption that the expected amount of imports in the first half of 2011 would be roughly equal to the average of imports for the first and second halves of 2010, a spokeswoman for the ministry said.

Hyundai Mobis, South Korea's top automotive parts maker and a major supplier to Hyundai Motor, said that the quota would have an impact on the two companies, as rare earth is used in electric motors for hybrid vehicles, and as Hyundai Motor is increasing its hybrid vehicle sales.

A spokesman for Hyundai Mobis added that the two companies have been preparing measures to cope with rare earth issues, including diversifying imports.

(Additional reporting by Nathan Layne and Kiyoshi Takenaka in TOKYO, Tom Miles and Niu Shuping in BEIJING and Hyun Joo Jin and Ju-min Park in SEOUL, Peter Harrison in BRUSSELS; Editing by Jon Boyle)

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6B...pnewsearly

Reply
#2
(30-12-2010, 12:17 AM)arthur Wrote: Personal comments: Its true that China has cornered 95% of world rare earth materials global supply. Its also true that rare earth are highly needed in electronic stuffs like your iphone.

However the perception I am getting from friends around me is China has control over practically the world rare earth supply.
Not yet.

Rare earth is a term to describe various materials such as ... (go chk wikipedia cos they are too exotic to memorise Tongue). The interesting thing is, there are plenty of them left on earth crust, even in USA.

The problem is the commodities plants to mine them, to process & refine are mainly own by China. Iron ore exist on earth too. But we have to process it with coking coal to get steel out of it.

So there.. my limited knowledge on rare earth. Hope it clears some doubts about the evil communist China who wouldn't give anyone a change to own the next iphone 5. Big Grin

I thought I read that it's not so much the problem that Rare Earths are rare but the environmental damage it creates from extracting them which is why the Chinese have so much market share of this. I'm not too sure about whether the Chinese are the only ones that have the expertise but I'm thinking that they don't.

I guess when push comes to shove, there would be many other poorer countries willing to take up the role of rare earth provider with some of the richer countries playing shadow capital provider.
Reply
#3
It's an irony that these latest high tech gadgets from iphones to production of steel, hybrid electric cars, to nuclear weapons require use of various rare earths.

my own thoughts are.

It's a dirty business and one that requires low cost manual labor do.

Either they themselves are running out of rare earths that they are protecting it for themselves.

or

they trying to strangle everybody with it. Nothing is said about limiting supply for industries in china so I guess they rely less on diplomacy and trying to force foreign corporations to relocate manufacturing facilities to china or just in case they thinking of leaving force them to stay on in china to ensure supply is not disrupted.

either way I think in future gadgets will no longer be cheap.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)