Posts: 1,039
Threads: 14
Joined: Dec 2012
Olam is a very difficult company to understand
Warren buffett once said "however, we’ve done better by avoiding dragons than by slaying them."
for value investors, I think this is a company to avoid investing in, be it equities or bonds
There are really many other companies listed on the sgx which have simpler business, better moat and higher margin of safety ^^
Posts: 1,446
Threads: 81
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
12
16-11-2013, 04:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-11-2013, 04:58 PM by sgd.)
had a slow evening yesterday just playing with calculator and drinking some delicious rum found some strange results.
for instance if net profit 350mil is just 1.75% margin of 20billion revenue that means for every $1 net profit they have to do $57.14 of business.
So to cover the 50mil extra cost for the bonds they need to earn more so X $57.14 = $2.8 billion worth of extra business a year
and this strange thing, the 750mil at 6.75% what purpose did they raise it for? becos if we div that by $57.14 only gives around $13 mil net profit but pay $50mil for coupons.
I must be getting it wrong some how, better don't drink rum while playing with calculator =)
Posts: 1,039
Threads: 14
Joined: Dec 2012
Olam is like a whale, it needs to eat a lot via debt and rights or placement. Its businesses doesnt generate much free cash flow and their earnings are manipulated by negative good will gains, muddy water research report covers all these points in detail.
Posts: 785
Threads: 9
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
12
I just would like to find out more regarding the impact of Temasek takeover on Olam bonds. It is currently traded at 104.8 but if Olam were to redeem earlier, the bond holder would be paid more than this. And even if the bonds will not be redeemed until maturity date, it is still fine because of Temasek's assurance. What also puzzle me is that if Olam to be delisted, will the bonds be delisted as well? If yes, then how would the bond holders dispose them before maturity?
Posts: 456
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
21
04-04-2014, 12:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2014, 12:10 PM by tanjm.)
I doubled my stake on the day that this deal was announced, and I'm sitting on a paper gain. But I intend to hold till maturity so delisting theoretically doesn't concern me. The bonds are obligations by Olam to bondholders. I haven't looked but I doubt that listing status is a condition and even if so, see below.
Having said that, the F&N episode shows that corporations can play games with the rules. In that particular case, a technical default (with forced redemption at par) was the threat brought to the table to get bondholders to agree to sell back bonds. In this case, i believe the same trick can't be tried and in any case it would be reputationally negative for Temasek.
So overall I'm happy to hold on till maturity. If Temasek/olam want to buy back the bonds, I'll be happy to consider. However my private estimate of the fair value of this bond may be around 110. It would be worth even more than 110 to me if Temasek really takes over and delists Olam.
Posts: 457
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
5
must know how to discount the coupon rate la!
Posts: 45
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
04-04-2014, 08:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2014, 08:50 PM by InvestArk.)
The bonds should be more or less quite stable due to the backing of temasek holdings. This would also present an opportunity for investors whom had earlier invested in either the company itself or the bond an exit avenue if they believe that olam is still fundamentally unsound. For investors that believes that Olam is still on track to deliver its previously stipulated targets then the advent of temasek holdings should be a big boost of confidence. (you have the big boys behind u)
If rates continue to stay low (or delays in rates hikes by the new fed chief) than the appreciation of the bond will be a very likely scenario.
However, my opinion is do try to focus back on the fundamentals of an investment rather than the speculative part of it (e.g will the rates go up/down and when?) as no one would really know.