29-04-2013, 09:00 AM
(29-04-2013, 08:44 AM)Muck Wrote:(29-04-2013, 08:27 AM)AlphaQuant Wrote:(28-04-2013, 11:15 PM)Dividend Warrior Wrote: I think at old age, people tend to take less risks....they prefer to preserve their capital instead of investing for income.
Maybe annuities is the way to go......
the "100-rule" is a pretty good guide, imho.
in short, allocate your age's portion of your portfolio to fixed-income and the rest to riskier assets. i.e. a 70y.o should have 70% in "safe" assets.
I suppose you're talking about (near) risk-free debt instruments when you say "fixed income" assets cos there are many out there that are as risky (if not more) than equities. However, under this low interest rate environment, one is likely to make capital losses unless one holds the securities to maturity. And even then, current yields for AAA-type debt securities are dismally low. As has been said, the current environment "punishes" the savers and retirees.
For me, I have a new perspective about annuities. I see them as Perpetual Bonds bounded by a contract. Though they are issued by insurance companies, I believe they are heavily regulated by the govt. The govt will not wish for any of the insurers here to fail as it will affect a good portion of the population. The 3.3%pa return is not much, but should be good enough for something I consider pretty safe.