Posts: 402
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
5
1) CityFarmer -Hey! We had similar experiences
As a buyer, I always laugh when I see big cars and "grand palaces" when we visit potential suppliers pitching for our business. It's a dead give away I can press prices down for a "short" term relationship.
2) Jacmar - My points exactly
That's a great way to weed out the "free-loaders"
Just google singapore man of leisure
Posts: 484
Threads: 11
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
8
I know of one Singapore listed company where the CEO owns a yacht. SG Medical, if I recall correctly. My answer to the question posed by the title of this particular thread is in this case.................... a resolute yes.
Not vested ........... in either SG Medical or a yacht. I find both prohibitively expensive.
RBM, Retired Botanic MatSalleh
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
(12-06-2012, 04:01 PM)sgd Wrote: So warren buffet owns a jets so everybody shud dump his company shares then?
As far as i know, Warren Buffet does not own a jet. He own a jet company, he is using the service of his own company
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 775
Threads: 5
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
16
Nothing wrong if the owner spends $ on a luxury. He works hard for his company.
St****** Ow Chio Kiat pays $2000 for a pair of shoes from his own pocket. I dont see a problem too...
Posts: 44
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation:
0
My version of it will be.. If you see your CEO constantly appearing in Tatler magazine, sell the stock.
Check out how many times the Wiluans appear at these social events. I think that's worse than owning a yacht.
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
IMO, the key point is the prudence with company finance by CEO, rather than his/her personal spending habit.
As long the company finance been managed with prudence, i will rather ignore the CEO personal spending habit
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 543
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
14
definitely, it does not make any sense to sell a piece of wonderful stock just because the CEO likes to splurge on luxury to reward himself. The better questions might be is he spending more than he earns, or is it simply that he is earning too much as compared to the profits the company is generating?