09-06-2014, 06:58 PM
if we add the cash to the financial instrument, its ard 75m. so more than 10c/share is basically in cash.
09-06-2014, 06:58 PM
if we add the cash to the financial instrument, its ard 75m. so more than 10c/share is basically in cash.
14-07-2014, 07:50 PM
With inflation rate at 3 to 4% per annum, the dividend yield (based on 0.5 cent dividend) at current market share price cannot even cover inflation ?
Am I right? (28-04-2014, 04:55 AM)heifien91 Wrote:(27-04-2014, 10:42 PM)corydorus Wrote: If we are going for dividends, why not Telcos, Reits etc. Why do we want to take in so much assumptions or risks into consideration to have all the stars align to achieve it.
[I am not here to promote any stocks. Please always do your own research before embarking on any investment decision. I will not be liable for any of your own decisions. Your use of any information or materials is entirely at your own risk. It is your responsibility to ensure that any products, services or information meet your specific requirements. I do not produce material which meets the objectives of any specific financial and risk profile of investors.]
14-07-2014, 09:19 PM
(14-07-2014, 07:50 PM)Curiousparty Wrote: With inflation rate at 3 to 4% per annum, the dividend yield (based on 0.5 cent dividend) at current market share price cannot even cover inflation ? I think the bigger question is whether dividend yields are suppose to cover inflation rates in the first place.
http://theasiareport.com - Reflections From Finding Value In Asia
14-07-2014, 10:20 PM
If the management develops Kim Chuan to collect rental, then how can the real value be unlocked?
if the intent is to develop and sell, then the recent declining property sentiment (which is set to continue for a few more years) does not help.
[I am not here to promote any stocks. Please always do your own research before embarking on any investment decision. I will not be liable for any of your own decisions. Your use of any information or materials is entirely at your own risk. It is your responsibility to ensure that any products, services or information meet your specific requirements. I do not produce material which meets the objectives of any specific financial and risk profile of investors.]
15-07-2014, 09:37 AM
(14-07-2014, 10:20 PM)Curiousparty Wrote: If the management develops Kim Chuan to collect rental, then how can the real value be unlocked? That really boils down to each and every individual's investing mandate. For deep value investors, I am indeed buying a dollar for 50 cents, just that this true value might take much longer to realise (vested)
ValueEdge - Opportunities Within Asia
http://www.value-edge.com
16-07-2014, 08:03 PM
The key problem is CATALYST.
Companies can remained undervalued for years, even after u are no longer on this Earth... (15-07-2014, 09:37 AM)heifien91 Wrote:(14-07-2014, 10:20 PM)Curiousparty Wrote: If the management develops Kim Chuan to collect rental, then how can the real value be unlocked?
[I am not here to promote any stocks. Please always do your own research before embarking on any investment decision. I will not be liable for any of your own decisions. Your use of any information or materials is entirely at your own risk. It is your responsibility to ensure that any products, services or information meet your specific requirements. I do not produce material which meets the objectives of any specific financial and risk profile of investors.]
16-07-2014, 09:49 PM
What causes a cheap stock to find its value?
Benjamin Graham: That is one of the mysteries of our business, and it is a mystery to me as well as to everybody else. [But] we know from experience that eventually the market catches up with value. theasiareport.com (16-07-2014, 08:03 PM)Curiousparty Wrote: The key problem is CATALYST.
http://theasiareport.com - Reflections From Finding Value In Asia
17-07-2014, 09:23 AM
(16-07-2014, 08:03 PM)Curiousparty Wrote: The key problem is CATALYST. Like I said, it really boils down to each of our investing mandate. Once, I did think like you that each stock has to have a catalyst for the stock price to rise and hit fair value. However, after reading research papers based on statistical evidence and all, over the long run such stocks would just normalise back to the mean. That said, even if it were to remain undervalued for years, at least every night I can rest well knowing full well that I bought a stock with an adequate mos.
ValueEdge - Opportunities Within Asia
http://www.value-edge.com
28-07-2014, 11:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-07-2014, 11:31 PM by Curiousparty.)
http://www.btinvest.com.sg/system/bti/pr...g28-29.pdf
Not good news for industrial market segment *********** The government seems to be adopting a two-pronged approach to calibrate the industrial property market. While cooling measures were imposed to douse the exuberant buying sentiment, measures were also put in place to ensure that genuine industrialists’ needs are catered to. To ensure that there is sufficient industrial space for businesses, some 20.42 ha of industrial land (eight sites on the confirmed list and five sites on the reserve list), catering to both light and heavy industries have been provided for under the IGLS programme slated for the first half of 2014. To ensure affordability of land prices, these sites have tenure of 30 years or less. Anti-speculation measures imposed in 2013 have been effective across the industrial sector. Although the authorities have stated that they may consider lifting the SSD depending on market conditions, we believe that this is unlikely to occur in the immediate future. As such, buyers seeking to enter the industrial market would likely be long-term investors or end-users. Measures like the TDSR have curtailed the number of speculators seeking to take advantage of the current low interest rate environment, by imposing stringent checks on their outstanding financial obligations. Hence, going forward, we would expect capital values of strata-titled conventional industrial space to stabilise in 2014, while the number of speculative subsale transaction would continue to taper.
[I am not here to promote any stocks. Please always do your own research before embarking on any investment decision. I will not be liable for any of your own decisions. Your use of any information or materials is entirely at your own risk. It is your responsibility to ensure that any products, services or information meet your specific requirements. I do not produce material which meets the objectives of any specific financial and risk profile of investors.]
28-07-2014, 11:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-07-2014, 12:05 AM by Curiousparty.)
Revenue = 7690sqm x 10.76 x efficiency ratio (say 80%) x 762 PSF (based on 2013 freehold rate) = $50 mil.
(basis: Factory units with 60-year lease and freehold tenure were transacted at an average of $441 psf and $762 psf, respectively, reflecting increases of 5 per cent and 8.5 per cent from 2012. ) Total cost of land ($zero) + construction = $1650 (PSM) x 7690sqm x 1.2 (20% buffer for rising labor cost, cost overrun)= $15 mil [Hupsteel is not in the business of construction. there might be cost overrun, etc] NAV created from KC project = $35 mil / 616 mil = 5.7 cents. The NAV (or revaluation gain) created from KC project is only a meager 5.7 cents, after waiting for a miserable 2-3 years How many " 5.7 cents NAV gain" can we create from all the freehold properties that Hupsteel has and how long do we have to wait for all to be redeveloped? we are looking at the RATE of NAV creation, relative to the existing NAV ***************** The Board of Directors of Hupsteel Limited (the "Company" and together with its subsidiaries, the “Group”) is pleased to announce that the Group has entered into an agreement (“the Building Agreement”) to redevelop its freehold property at 6 Kim Chuan Drive (the “Property”) into a 7-storey industrial building with an elevated car park having a gross floor area of 7,690 square metres.
[I am not here to promote any stocks. Please always do your own research before embarking on any investment decision. I will not be liable for any of your own decisions. Your use of any information or materials is entirely at your own risk. It is your responsibility to ensure that any products, services or information meet your specific requirements. I do not produce material which meets the objectives of any specific financial and risk profile of investors.]
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|