Posts: 606
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
6
Warning to the employers or agencies is only the formality, or so-called wayang. If they are serious about it and have Sporeans in their heart , they should not approve EP, PR like no body biz. They make it look so cheap. Many of my PRC colleagues are even laughing at our policies.
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
It's definitely Wayang like the Indonesians or Malaysians like to say about their Gamen. It's only very natural for human beings to look out for their own tribe. Only we(The Elites) don't really look after our own "tribe" except for themselves(ELITES) first. I have worked in such company with so many foreigners looking out for each other. So is my wife. So is my wife's nephew. If our Gamen really look out for us, how can there be more than 35% of working in Singapore are foreigners. Not to mention PRs.
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Posts: 254
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
6
Just puzzled, why many citizens support such practice ?
Posts: 227
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
2
The bosses support such practice to get cheaper employees.
The (daft) workers support such practice on the believe that it will create more jobs.
Posts: 254
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
6
01-11-2011, 07:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2011, 07:28 PM by tonylim.)
Such cases shouldn't be happen in the first place, need a top piltician to give warning ?
Which country has such practice that place their own citizens last when come to employment ?
Posts: 174
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
2
01-11-2011, 11:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2011, 07:43 AM by hyom.)
The guidelines against discrimination may make things worse. If they are not keen to employ Singaporeans, then better state so upfront so that Singaporeans do not waste time applying for the job. Singaporeans may end up wasting time at job interviews because employers want to put on a wayang show to impress the government. It is also wasting the employers' time. Loss of productivity.
Singaporean men should be compensated for the discrimination they suffered because of their National Service liabilities. However, to be fair, the compensation should be done by taxpayers and not employers. Expecting employers to put up with the inconveniences caused by NS liabilities will result in job discrimination. It is not surprising that in recent years, discrimination has risen to intolerable levels because employers now have a big pool of foreigners to choose from with no NS liabilities. But really, can you blame employers? If you are an entrepreneur just starting out and you need to save to the last penny, would you prefer a foreigner or a Singaporean (all things being equal)?
Discrimination against fellow Singaporean NSmen must stop. However, somebody must pay the price. It should be the government, not employers. When I mean government, I mean all taxpayers because everyone residing in Singapore is benefiting from the security provided by NS men. The tax burden should be borne less or not at all by NS men as they have already made a big sacrifice to the nation. It is a fair thing to ask.
------------------------------------
Trust yourself only with your money