Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
(16-04-2014, 11:52 AM)safetyfirst Wrote: i have attended some AGMs with few people attending, and i see that the food goes to waste. I think ta bao is alright as long as the intention is not to waste food, provided most shareholders have left the place. but if ta bao is done right at the start, then i think it is not too nice la!
I think people who view themselves as business owners will attend agms. People who view stocks as securities that are traded online/brokers dont really see agms as something important
i think you are right to a certain extend. i view myself as a "ROJAK INVESTOR".
But then how can you be sure what you see is what you get at AGM?
The same with reading ARs. We can only hope what we read and see is really what we get.
There is such thing as "window dressings" most of the times in anything people do. It's up to each of us how to see the differences in the things people do. And what you interpret may be different from mine though we may see the same things or ARS.
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Posts: 96
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
1
i attended 2nd chance AGM last year. Management did an excellent thing with regards to food. They implement a lunch box concept. Each shareholder is given a food voucher which can used to redeem your lunch box. there was no rush for food at the end of AGM. There was no food wastage too. I think other companies should implement this concept too.
Posts: 230
Threads: 3
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
2
Try Singtel or DBS AGMs. Those turn in madness once the buffet doors open.
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
(16-04-2014, 02:21 PM)changwk Wrote: i attended 2nd chance AGM last year. Management did an excellent thing with regards to food. They implement a lunch box concept. Each shareholder is given a food voucher which can used to redeem your lunch box. there was no rush for food at the end of AGM. There was no food wastage too. I think other companies should implement this concept too.
I believe quite a number of companies did the same e.g. SPH, OCBC etc IIRC
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 750
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
48
The company in question for the AGM mentioned by Andrew Seow seems to be the recent M1 AGM. Yes, there was a mad rush for food after the AGM and some even left before the meeting ended so that they can get a "head start" when the buffet door opens.
Often, you can see people "ambush" near the AGM venue so that when the buffet door opens, they can join in for food. I suspect some of them are not even shareholders of the company in the first place. They are just part of the "makan party" where the aim of the day is to get free food. You might be surprised that they go hungry for the whole day just for that. It is now or never for them with respect to AGM food.
Posts: 598
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
15
In one of the AGM I attended, I saw a SH loading handful of grapes into both his pockets, apparently because he does not have a plastic bag to packet them. I wonder what will happen to AGM when people are allow to buy stocks at 100 shares/lot. Obviously, more food will have to be cater to the enlarged SH crowd, or no food during AGM.
Posts: 232
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
2
Its ok if you are a shareholder I believe (not the ta bao) but if you are not and you go there for the food..... is that not ungracious?
Its like an uninvited guest, gatecrashing into a wedding or party.
Don't tell me they do not have enough to eat, it is basically greedy.
Even if there are food available, some hotels do arrange for package and deliver to the needy.
Is that not better?