Manulife US REIT

[CY09]

While Manulife gives a good cryptic explanation to why its sales has not been up to pace.

Investors have to note that under MUST sales agreement, it must sell (i) US$230 million by end 2024 and (ii) US$98.7 million additional by mid June 2025

There are penalties involved where if MUST does not meet (i), its loan interest will rise from 7.25% to 8% and (b) an penalty of 1% of US$230 million minus the sales proceed. MUST has not sold a single property and the penalty nears with each passing day

[weijian]

These insiders may probably be right with the assessment that "next 3 year will have wonderful opportunities not seen in the last 30years". But the opportunity is probably only reserved for those who don't need rates normalcy or in other words, are able to take advantage of rates abnormalcy. 

So, these wonderful opportunities will probably be built on the likes of Manulife REIT.

MINUTES OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

The next 3-year period will have some wonderful investment opportunities that John and I probably have not seen in the last 30 years including the Great Financial Crisis. That will also allow us to grow in asset value, because, to Mushtaque’s point, at some point, there will be some return to normalcy.

While we will always focus on the 10-year long-term part of the curve, there is a 3-year and 5-year floating rate financing, and also some fixed rate financing at the 5-year point. When we return to the normal interest rate structure where it is no longer the flatter inverse, the shorter end of the curve will be lower than where it is today relative to the 10-year. We hope that the return to normalcy for the interest rate structure will allow us to access shorter term financing as opposed to longer term financing. There is light at the end of the tunnel, but we do need a return to normalcy. In this regard, we had reached an agreement with the lenders for a 2-year moratorium.

https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/Manulife%...eID=803483

[CY09]

Weijian you are right MUST won't capitalized on it. Sun belt property are in demand because they are of submarket with stronger demand due to low state corporate tax

Despite prime having done a divestment on an old Sunbelt property to ensure it lives, MUST is still struggling to sell. MUST could sell it's 3 sun belt property and it will be safe. However it will be left with very old properties that need high CAPEX.

About the topic of valuation, it is inevitable that another round of downward valuation will happen. MUST Figueroa property should be overvalued because a nearby office block was sold at a much lower price and has higher NLA and retail zoning to MUST's

Among the 3 US REITs, MUST has the second oldest property portfolio and the least ideal property locations. This means it needs to pay down debt and give capex to it's existing office building otherwise tenancy will fall. End state, it is likely the entire tranche 1 property will be sold and 01 of tranche 2.

Future wise, I do think MUST will sell down at least 01 tranche 1 building before may 2025 to pay off the first tranche of debt. After which, MUST may opt to take the penalty in it's financial covenant by not completing the required sale amount. But it will damage it's cash flow. It could be a strategy of waiting for the commercial real estate to rebound by paying an even more expensive debt. Please see my earlier post on the effects of the financial penalty