Singapore Exchange (SGX)

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Perhaps taking some ideas from the Income deal update ...

My point is more about the CDP charges per transfer, e.g. how is the pricing derived ? is it competitive ? would alternative fee structures be better for the retail investorsĀ ? are charges being reviewed regularly given the technology advancement ?

Would it be better for our stock market if CDP is a separate non-profit institution(assuming it's under SGX P&L currently ? ) given the unique role in the ecosystem ?

--------------------

Singapore blocks Income-Allianz deal but leaves door open if concerns over public interest are fully addressed
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...ng-4675491
Reply
(14-10-2024, 05:03 PM)dreamybear Wrote: Would it be better for our stock market if CDP is a separate non-profit institution(assuming it's under SGX P&L currently ? ) given the unique role in the ecosystem ?

hi dreamybear,

The CDP is a wholly owned subsidiary of SGX. Besides been the depository agent (ie holding stocks in trust) as discussed, it is also a clearing house that removes the counterparty risk talked about earlier.

I do not think this role is unique in the ecosystem as it is very common elsewhere. For example the LME, bought by HKEX some time back, is a clearing house between commodity traders.

Risk is multi-fold. Taking low risk actions doesn't mean you will achieve results of lower risk. For example, keeping money in the bank is a low risk move against failed investments but exposes one to other risks like scams or inflation. Actions to address known risks will probably create new risks. For example, car seat belts were invented to address mortal injuries resulting in fatal car accidents but because they felt safe, more non-fatal accidents happened as a result even as fatal accidents did reduce.
Reply
Hi dreamybear,

In my own personal view, the price structure of CDP is competitive. Considering most of the CDP account holders are long term investors, they only incur a one off transfer fee or higher brokerage for CDP settlement. Otherwise, there are no ongoing charges like platform fees, quarterly/annual fees, rights/dividends handling fees, minimum trades to maintain account etc.

For those who prefer cheaper rates, they are mostly frequent traders as higher fees eat into their transactions as they transact frequently and possibly will not be attending AGMs as well. For these group of people, I would recommend them to transact with discount brokers using custody accounts, since they would not be holding their positions long enough to justify higher one-off fees.

Of course, one can use a combination of custody and CDP accounts to hold your shares, depending on your time horizon for those set of stocks that you are interested in. Some for long term holdings, some for trading only.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)