28-06-2012, 02:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-06-2012, 02:35 PM by shanrui_91.)
Not too long ago, the government reduces the maximum industral leasehold tenure from 60 years to 30 years. While this applies only for the new land, will this have any impact on the Boustead's DBL model in the long run?
To be optimistic, maybe more will adopt the DBL instead of DBST given that they will face higher exit cost. To be pessimistic, that might mean that Boustead will have DBL portfolio of shorter land lease which might make it even harder them to spin off as a REIT
When a customer signs up a DBL project with Boustead, can I assume that Boustead will be the one that will source for industrial land to lease? Does Boustead then have the right to choose which piece of land to lease? When I check the last annual report ending Mar 2011, under the properties held for sale, most of the Singapore's properties are either 60 years or 30 years with option to renew another 30 years with a starting period from 2005-2007.
(vested)
To be optimistic, maybe more will adopt the DBL instead of DBST given that they will face higher exit cost. To be pessimistic, that might mean that Boustead will have DBL portfolio of shorter land lease which might make it even harder them to spin off as a REIT
When a customer signs up a DBL project with Boustead, can I assume that Boustead will be the one that will source for industrial land to lease? Does Boustead then have the right to choose which piece of land to lease? When I check the last annual report ending Mar 2011, under the properties held for sale, most of the Singapore's properties are either 60 years or 30 years with option to renew another 30 years with a starting period from 2005-2007.
(vested)