Homepage
PR Newswire
20-10-2014, 04:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-12-2020, 07:05 PM by cyclone.
Edit Reason: Change thread title
)
Consortium bid could end Reebok alliance with Adidas
MAUREEN FARRELL THE WALL STREET JOURNAL OCTOBER 20, 2014 12:19PM
Customer Stacee Pablo tries to decide between Reebok and Nike.
Customer Stacee Pablo tries to decide between Reebok and Nike. Source: News Corp Australia
A CONSORTIUM of investors from Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi is launching a bid to buy Reebok from Adidas AG in a move that, if successful, would unwind an eight-year-old marriage of sneaker makers that has shown disappointing results.
Jynwel Capital, the investment arm of the billionaire Low family of Asia, and funds affiliated with the government of Abu Dhabi, planned to send a letter to Adidas directors imminently, offering to buy its Reebok business for about 1.7 billion euros ($US2.2 billion), people close to the matter said. They are expected to argue that Reebok would have a brighter future if it were managed independently, echoing a sentiment that has underpinned a recent wave of corporate breakups.
It isn’t clear how receptive Adidas might be to the bid and there is no assurance it would be successful.
Adidas bought Reebok in 2006 for roughly 3 billion euros ($US3.8 billion) with the intention of creating a footwear and sporting-apparel company that would rival Nike Inc. and have more clout with retailers.
Another aim of the deal was to give Adidas more heft in the US, where it trailed Nike. Instead, Nike has gained significant ground against both brands since the deal was struck.
In 2005, the year the deal was announced, Adidas and Reebok ranked second and third in US footwear retail-market share, with 10 per cent and 8 per cent respectively, according to industry researcher SportsOneSource.
Adidas’s share of that market has fallen to 6 per cent this year, while Reebok’s is down to 1.8 per cent. Meanwhile, Nike’s market share, including its proprietary Jordan brand, has climbed to nearly 60 per cent from 35 per cent in 2005.
“There’s always been this complaint around Adidas that it didn’t make products that were appropriate for the US market, and instead tried to impose a worldwide product line on the U.S.,” SportsOneSource analyst Matt Powell said. The US accounts for roughly 40% of the global sneaker market.
Adidas has shrunk Reebok through asset sales and other deals. In 2006, it sold the Greg Norman Collection, a brand of golf apparel. It’s also seeking to sell Rockport, a maker of boat and dress shoes.
Adidas also took over Reebok’s sponsorship contract with the National Basketball Association, and Reebok didn’t renew its sponsorship deal with the National Football League.
Recently Adidas has worked to reposition Reebok as a fitness brand, and it has struck partnership deals with CrossFit and others.
The Reebok brand is showing signs of a turnaround, Ingbert Faust, an analyst at Equinet Bank in Germany, said in a research note.
Reebok generated 712 million euros in sales, mostly from sneakers and apparel, in the first half of 2014.
The architect of the bid for Reebok is Jho Low, the 32-year-old chief executive of Jynwel Capital. Mr Low, the grandson of a mining and liquor entrepreneur, is no stranger to big merger deals.
Jynwel, which invests his family’s roughly $US1.75 billion fortune, was among groups that purchased New York’s Park Lane Hotel for $US660 million in 2013 and EMI’s music-publishing business for $US2.2 billion in 2012. It’s unclear which Abu Dhabi fund would partner with Jynwel should the Reebok bid succeed.
People close to the bidders say the group believes Reebok would benefit from management and ownership that would be better able to focus on reviving the brand’s fortunes in the US outside the glare of public shareholders. The group wants to continue down Reebok’s current strategic path and give the business more financing for marketing and store rollouts, the people said. The investors would seek to keep Reebok’s top executives, who work out of the business’s headquarters in Canton, Massachusetts, the people said.
The bidding consortium first approached Reebok’s management late last year about putting together a joint venture to roll out high-end fitness brands and build dozens of additional stores in the US and internationally.
As those discussions progressed, the consortium’s ambitions for the deal grew, the people said. By the northern summer, the group had decided to make a bid for the entire business.
Adidas, the world’s second-largest sportswear maker after Nike, has struggled this year, which has led some shareholders to push for change at the company.
Adidas in late July cut its profit forecast for this year and next — the second time it has done this in a little over a year. The company blamed declining demand for its golf products in the US, currency pressure in Russia and marketing costs for the World Cup, which it sponsored.
Adidas stock is down more than 40 per cent this year, compared with a gain of nearly 11 per cent for Nike. It’s still up more than 60 per cent since the company announced its acquisition of Reebok.
In a bid to revive its shares, Adidas this month announced a stock buyback of up to 1.5 billion euros ($US1.9 billion). On its most recent earnings call in August, Adidas noted that the Reebok brand has notched five consecutive quarters of sales growth. Mark King, the newly appointed Adidas North America president, said in an interview in September that he is working to improve the speed with which the company responds to trends in the sportswear industry.
But some investors say the company isn’t doing enough, and they have called on Adidas to accelerate its turnaround or push out its chief executive, Herbert Hainer, who has been at the helm since 2001. Earlier this year, the company announced it had extended Mr Hainer’s contract through 2017 as it develops a succession plan.
Wall Street Journal
MAUREEN FARRELL THE WALL STREET JOURNAL OCTOBER 20, 2014 12:19PM
Customer Stacee Pablo tries to decide between Reebok and Nike.
Customer Stacee Pablo tries to decide between Reebok and Nike. Source: News Corp Australia
A CONSORTIUM of investors from Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi is launching a bid to buy Reebok from Adidas AG in a move that, if successful, would unwind an eight-year-old marriage of sneaker makers that has shown disappointing results.
Jynwel Capital, the investment arm of the billionaire Low family of Asia, and funds affiliated with the government of Abu Dhabi, planned to send a letter to Adidas directors imminently, offering to buy its Reebok business for about 1.7 billion euros ($US2.2 billion), people close to the matter said. They are expected to argue that Reebok would have a brighter future if it were managed independently, echoing a sentiment that has underpinned a recent wave of corporate breakups.
It isn’t clear how receptive Adidas might be to the bid and there is no assurance it would be successful.
Adidas bought Reebok in 2006 for roughly 3 billion euros ($US3.8 billion) with the intention of creating a footwear and sporting-apparel company that would rival Nike Inc. and have more clout with retailers.
Another aim of the deal was to give Adidas more heft in the US, where it trailed Nike. Instead, Nike has gained significant ground against both brands since the deal was struck.
In 2005, the year the deal was announced, Adidas and Reebok ranked second and third in US footwear retail-market share, with 10 per cent and 8 per cent respectively, according to industry researcher SportsOneSource.
Adidas’s share of that market has fallen to 6 per cent this year, while Reebok’s is down to 1.8 per cent. Meanwhile, Nike’s market share, including its proprietary Jordan brand, has climbed to nearly 60 per cent from 35 per cent in 2005.
“There’s always been this complaint around Adidas that it didn’t make products that were appropriate for the US market, and instead tried to impose a worldwide product line on the U.S.,” SportsOneSource analyst Matt Powell said. The US accounts for roughly 40% of the global sneaker market.
Adidas has shrunk Reebok through asset sales and other deals. In 2006, it sold the Greg Norman Collection, a brand of golf apparel. It’s also seeking to sell Rockport, a maker of boat and dress shoes.
Adidas also took over Reebok’s sponsorship contract with the National Basketball Association, and Reebok didn’t renew its sponsorship deal with the National Football League.
Recently Adidas has worked to reposition Reebok as a fitness brand, and it has struck partnership deals with CrossFit and others.
The Reebok brand is showing signs of a turnaround, Ingbert Faust, an analyst at Equinet Bank in Germany, said in a research note.
Reebok generated 712 million euros in sales, mostly from sneakers and apparel, in the first half of 2014.
The architect of the bid for Reebok is Jho Low, the 32-year-old chief executive of Jynwel Capital. Mr Low, the grandson of a mining and liquor entrepreneur, is no stranger to big merger deals.
Jynwel, which invests his family’s roughly $US1.75 billion fortune, was among groups that purchased New York’s Park Lane Hotel for $US660 million in 2013 and EMI’s music-publishing business for $US2.2 billion in 2012. It’s unclear which Abu Dhabi fund would partner with Jynwel should the Reebok bid succeed.
People close to the bidders say the group believes Reebok would benefit from management and ownership that would be better able to focus on reviving the brand’s fortunes in the US outside the glare of public shareholders. The group wants to continue down Reebok’s current strategic path and give the business more financing for marketing and store rollouts, the people said. The investors would seek to keep Reebok’s top executives, who work out of the business’s headquarters in Canton, Massachusetts, the people said.
The bidding consortium first approached Reebok’s management late last year about putting together a joint venture to roll out high-end fitness brands and build dozens of additional stores in the US and internationally.
As those discussions progressed, the consortium’s ambitions for the deal grew, the people said. By the northern summer, the group had decided to make a bid for the entire business.
Adidas, the world’s second-largest sportswear maker after Nike, has struggled this year, which has led some shareholders to push for change at the company.
Adidas in late July cut its profit forecast for this year and next — the second time it has done this in a little over a year. The company blamed declining demand for its golf products in the US, currency pressure in Russia and marketing costs for the World Cup, which it sponsored.
Adidas stock is down more than 40 per cent this year, compared with a gain of nearly 11 per cent for Nike. It’s still up more than 60 per cent since the company announced its acquisition of Reebok.
In a bid to revive its shares, Adidas this month announced a stock buyback of up to 1.5 billion euros ($US1.9 billion). On its most recent earnings call in August, Adidas noted that the Reebok brand has notched five consecutive quarters of sales growth. Mark King, the newly appointed Adidas North America president, said in an interview in September that he is working to improve the speed with which the company responds to trends in the sportswear industry.
But some investors say the company isn’t doing enough, and they have called on Adidas to accelerate its turnaround or push out its chief executive, Herbert Hainer, who has been at the helm since 2001. Earlier this year, the company announced it had extended Mr Hainer’s contract through 2017 as it develops a succession plan.
Wall Street Journal