Based on the last annual report, the MAM (Maritime Asset Management) has 12 ships and only 3 are 100% owned by UniAsia, while the rest are mostly 18% or 50% owned. This unit provides the equity ownership of the 12 ships. Each of the 12 ships are setup as a subsidiary.
The Uni-Asia Shipping (UAS) is the holding company that owns these subsidaries.
Finally, there is the Maritime Services (MS) that provides the services, and Uni-Asia gets paid to run/maintain the ships.
So, these 3 portions (MAM, UAS and MS) make up the Shipping Business. I see this setup very similar to a REIT manager. REIT manager has partial share ownership, and earn recurring income from managing the assets, which is what this Shipping Business is doing. Majority of the ships are joint ownership, sort of like the REIT owns 50% of the property asset, and gets to earn income managing it. If I am not wrong, the ship's joint owners are also charterers of the same ship. So, there is an alignment of interest in the asset. Uni-Asia will ensure ship is well run and managed, while the charterer also has confidence that Uni-Asia on ship's maintenance and well-being since all parties have vested interest in the same ship asset.
If Uni-Asia has zero asset stake, charterer can always move the the next cheaper charter. Then the recurring income from MS will not be secured. I see this arrangement as making sure everyone has their skin in the game. Just like why the REIT sponsor like CaptailLand owns significant stake in CapMall Trust, and also collects fees managing the REIT assets.
MAM just had an impairment of USD3.9m for containerships. (Only 3 out of 12 ships are containships). This has no impact to operations or cashflow, and I see it more of an accounting number for the balance sheet. When UniAsia buys a ship at say USD10m, it will depreciates it over the "useful life" of the ship. The remaining value after accumulated depreciation will be the carrying value in their books. Accounting rules is conservative, as the rules require them to reflect the current value of these assets in their reporting. The ship value is usually based on transacted sale prices of similar assets. However, if the ship continues to be employed, the cash flow will not be impacted. In simple terms, its just like a full occupied mall with rental income has to be written down to zero value because the surrounding malls are sold at depressed prices (which is used to determine current mall asset valuation).
Just my opinion. Why does UniAsia need to raise funds? For property investments in Hong Kong or Japan, you don't pay 100% cash. Usually, there is a need to put down some equity, and banks will also assess your borrowing capacity based on your equity in your balance sheet. A weaker profile will also mean higher borrowing costs. So, the additional equity raise at a discount will offset costs in other areas.
Its good if the management made decisions that is beneficial to the shareholders. I usually view management share purchase as positive as that aligns with shareholder's interest. Its having their skin in the game too. I can see purchases by management, although liquidity is low.
http://uniasia.listedcompany.com/stock_insider.html
(Vested)