(04-06-2022, 01:38 PM)CY09 Wrote: If so, tencent is going struggle in growing profits. Its margins have been reduced due to policies. What is propping its net income are asset sales and revaluation gains from such sales.
Without asset sales, Tencent is about 60 times P/E. It is an expensive stock with little growth
I would not say that Tencent is 60X PE even after stripping out revaluation gains from its net income.
Based on (see attached image)
(i) share price of HKD363;
(ii) valuing its investees at book value;
(iii) core FY2021 PATMI of RMB124B;
I obtained PE of 17X.
Point (ii) may be a controversial point. Why assign a value to investees?
First, because these investees are not contributing to PATMI at present. But yet there is a value to them as evidenced by some of them being listed and having a market cap to them.
Second, I see Tencent investees differently from Ali investees. Ali's investees, I feel, may be loss-leaders for Ali, their role is to be loss-making to protect Ali's flanks, to protect Taobao and Tmall. I would thus not assign any value to Ali's investees whe i value Alibaba. Tencent's investees however are different. Tencent does not need these investees to protect Wechat. Instead it is Wechat that strengthens these investees.
Third, then it is about what value is placed on Tencent's investees. I think many analysts will use market value (e.g. based on latest share price). For me I take book value. Of course if one wants to be more conservative, one can also chose to take a 50% haircut of book value.
[attachment=1834]