Hi Reenat,
The previous offer at 83c was deemed "Fair and Reasonable" by the IFA. Obviously, they can come again with the same offer price, and chances are the IFA will deemed it as "Fair and Reasonable" as well.
The problem comes when more minorities accepted the the next offer, resulting in the free float going below 10%. It is a highly possible scenario, since there is only around 11% free float currently.
Then, it will become the Boustead Projects situation when its free float goes below 10%. If they do not restore it, they would have to give a delisting exit offer. Again, the delisting exit offer is not expected to be generous as well, since if the offer is deemed "Fair and Reasonable" by the IFA. Likely to be at the same price.
Therefore, in order to remain listed, minorities must be persistent enough to block out any offers coming ahead because it is very unlikely that they will increase the free float going forward. Otherwise, the risk of delisting is always there.
The previous offer at 83c was deemed "Fair and Reasonable" by the IFA. Obviously, they can come again with the same offer price, and chances are the IFA will deemed it as "Fair and Reasonable" as well.
The problem comes when more minorities accepted the the next offer, resulting in the free float going below 10%. It is a highly possible scenario, since there is only around 11% free float currently.
Then, it will become the Boustead Projects situation when its free float goes below 10%. If they do not restore it, they would have to give a delisting exit offer. Again, the delisting exit offer is not expected to be generous as well, since if the offer is deemed "Fair and Reasonable" by the IFA. Likely to be at the same price.
Therefore, in order to remain listed, minorities must be persistent enough to block out any offers coming ahead because it is very unlikely that they will increase the free float going forward. Otherwise, the risk of delisting is always there.