05-03-2013, 11:06 AM
(05-03-2013, 10:35 AM)sgd Wrote:(05-03-2013, 10:16 AM)Temperament Wrote: Ah......! i had posted in this blog about 2 Noble Prize winners who "designed" the "LTCM" hedge fund that went kaput; about WB EQ is more important than IQ and of course Isacc Newton
If only maths alone, why so many are still not very, very rich in the stock markets. i think i have said more than enough.
singaporean mentality everybody want to "sure win" pao jia and nobody want to lose I myself also same who like to lose but I willing to take risk. Not everybody can take risk.
You look at magnus 5:1 asset/debt vs share price if it goes kaput maybe you will still earn money. That's taking calculated risk. At most it ding dong a few years no earnings or some losses kena laughed at by forumers here but you need just to get a run like now lah and it will cheong like anything.
5:1 but last year it was losing money this year cheong is it a good stock? OF course not so what has changed? the speculators are here they are like piranha anything that looks weak and vulnerable in the water they will whack. It's piranha season boys and gals.
Can printscreen to show us your successful transactions?... perhaps along with all others that dont make money to show the full picture