Posts: 24
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
heard from those working inside hospital that bed crunch is worst during the holidays period e.g. Dec because a lot of people go holidays and put their elderly into hospital for 24-hour care, although they are not sick. After one week, they are suddenly ok and discharge.
There are people using hospital bed for temporary hotels. It is cheaper than hotel, after all the subsidies. And safer than leaving the elderly alone at home.
Posts: 146
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
1
People who are personally hit or have relatives/friends who are affected by the bed crunch will feel the pain most. Healthcare should have been a major consideration before increasing population number. I hope its a hard lesson and the authority plan carefully before implementing critical politices.
Posts: 406
Threads: 8
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
5
If the doctors deem the elderly patients' condition serious enough to be admitted to hospital, those working inside hospital should not assume the patients' family members are using hospital bed as temporary hotels.
Healthcare workers have to be careful to draw the correct conclusions when looking at the correlations between elderly patients admissions and holidays.
For example, due to the recent hazy air, many elderly patients may have difficulty with their respiratory system. Please do not correlate increase in hospital admission, if any, with the march school holidays.
Posts: 692
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
7
13-03-2014, 05:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 13-03-2014, 05:45 PM by egghead.)
The thing with hospital patients is that unlike hotel guests who can simply change hotels, a hospital patients will have to move his entire medical history to a different hospital; so most patients end up going back to CGH despite it being very full.
Posts: 456
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
21
13-03-2014, 06:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 13-03-2014, 06:13 PM by tanjm.)
let's not forget that once you increase capacity, you are basically permanently increasing the fixed overhead of our health system. The ideal case is a health system that matches demand exactly - that's a tough act for anyone but armchair experts to follow.
Posts: 2,743
Threads: 23
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
25
14-03-2014, 12:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 14-03-2014, 12:09 PM by opmi.)
(13-03-2014, 06:12 PM)tanjm Wrote: let's not forget that once you increase capacity, you are basically permanently increasing the fixed overhead of our health system. The ideal case is a health system that matches demand exactly - that's a tough act for anyone but armchair experts to follow.
then how come the Punggol LRT was built and more than 15 years when the area was barren land...fenced up and sitting idle for >15 years.
then how come Airport T4 is being built in anticipation of demand when T3 not maxed out yet.
health care is even more important than 2 above for Singaporeans. why cant Govt plonked more money to build ahead of demand?
It is all about political will. Money can come from somewhere. Hey, thats what reserves is for. Not for investing for investing sake.
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
Posts: 146
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
1
Could be healthcare is a cost, but T4 is profit generating and to welcome FTs lol