(13-02-2011, 10:41 AM)taka666 Wrote: I'm not sure why they have not revealed why the sudden increase in capex compared to all the previous years.
Let me try to answer one of your question:
You will notice that FY08 & FY09 dividends were signficantly lower. During AGMs, the reasons cited was they are keeping the cash for Setco expansion - a new building at its Teban Crescent site. However due to the construction boom - the 2 casinos and 2 crackers, construction cost went up tremendously so the construction was postponed. The project was started again in 2010 when the construction cost dropped significantly. I'm guessing the Capex is partly due to the new plant.
In addition, Setsco also invested in a JV in Abu Dhabi for a Setsco Middle East Laboratory (Setsco owned 49%) with paid-up capital of US$1m. If I remember correctly, this is its first overseas foray after Malaysia.
I believe both the above were in the SGX announcements.
(13-02-2011, 09:04 PM)taka666 Wrote: I'm not sure about the venturing overseas part but I would be glad if Vicom looked into it. There might be growth there for the company in this aspect.
Setsco has overseas business in Malaysia and recently invested in a JV Lab in Abu Dhabi. Setsco has a good brandname - so should continue to see overseas opportunity.
As for Vicom vehicle inspection business, it is focussed on Singapore business. Previously there were two JV overseas investment in China but Vicom was only involved in consultancy, and eventually the vehicle inspection businesses in China were put under Comfort Delgro (Vicom's parent company).
(13-02-2011, 12:25 PM)mikh Wrote: 1. Setsco is the division growing its revenue. However, based on FY2010 AR, its Ops Profit of $9830k is about the same as the Vehicle Inspection's $9544k.
2. Unclear if Vicom still has 70% of market, and i could not see how the original 70% was derived. StarAuto also claims to be a leader. So it could be an issue of definition. I could claim to have 90% share for vehicle inspection in my home.
3. Some competitors in Setsco's areas appear to be SGS and STS (a unit of ST Kinectics). These would be formidable competitors. Could Vicom buy over STS just like it did Setsco? Doubt it because STS probably much more bigger, with better expertise.
4. However as pointed out, testing could be a growing market. Does it have expertise or a moat? Is Setsco pushing its business aggressively? Based on its website, there's not heavy marketing ambition. Can't see how it would have very special expertise beyond maybe a few individuals. Of course this could change later. Would also accept that this is just a personal, single facet assessment from its website.
That's not to say Vicom may not be a good investment.
My 2 cents on an unfamiliar business after reading the interest from forummers. Please feel free to re-butt.
Setsco is competing with both local and global testing and certification companies. Hence, its margin should be benchmarked with other testing and certification companies, and not Vicom. Despite such competition, the fact is it is able to continually achieve both top- and bottom-line growth. That speaks for itself whether it has competitive advantage vs competitors. True value company don't have to trumpet their marketing ambitions. They just quietly deliver excellent value to their customer from their simple and understated office.
Based on last year Annual Report, Vicom's market share is still > 70%. I don't have the figure here. You can google the no. of vehicle inspected by Vicom. Then from LTA website, obtain the total no. of vehicle inspected in Singapore. Then, do a simple division.