The top three customers of Applied Materials namely
Intel, Samsung and TSMC, have all retained their worldwide ranking as the top 3 semiconductor suppliers for 2012.
See Top 25 Ranking :
http://evertiq.com/news/24112
According to AR2012 of Applied Materials: “
Applied’s semiconductor customer base historically has been, and is becoming even more, highly concentrated as a result of economic and industry conditions. In fiscal 2012, three semiconductor manufacturers accounted for 60 percent of Silicon Systems Group net sales.”
(Comment: Applied Materials is exposed to increasing risks of high concentration customers base – is this good or bad ? Anyway, it is MUCH better (less concentrated) compared to that of UMS – haha !
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel, Samsung to dominate chip capex in 2013:
Peter Clarke
3/27/2013 2:20 PM EDT
“Intel and Samsung will spend $25 billion on increasing their manufacturing capacity in 2013 as
this sector of the industry continues to consolidate round very few leading-edge manufacturers, according to IC Insights.
Five companies that are expected to spend at least $3.0 billion in 2013, the same as in 2012 and 2011 and
the top-10 capital spenders in 2013 are forecast to increase their spending by 5 percent as compared to 2012, while non-top-10 companies are expected to cut spending by 8 percent.
Over the four-year period 2010 to 2013 Samsung is forecast to spend $46.9 billion, with about 60 percent on its memory production and 40 percent on its break into logic and foundry services. Over the same period Intel is forecast to make $40.0 billion in capital expenditure. "Notably, the combined spending by Samsung and Intel represented 40 percent of the world's semiconductor capital outlays in 2012, with this percentage expected to rise to 42 percent of total capital spending in 2013," IC Insights observed………………………..”
http://www.eetimes.com/design/eda-design...ex-in-2013
(Comment: The projected combined spending by Samsung and Intel is expected to rise to 42% of total capital spending in 2013. If capital spending of TSMC is included as well, the combined capital spending of the three companies would represent 57% of total capital spending in 2013.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Five IC Suppliers to Hold One-Third of 300mm Wafer Capacity in 2013: by IC Insights
““Samsung tops list; IC foundries expected to show biggest capacity gains through 2017.
It is a fact that semiconductor industry capital spending is becoming more concentrated with a greater percentage of spending coming from a shrinking number of companies. As a result, IC industry capacity is also becoming more concentrated and this trend is especially prevalent in 300mm wafer technology……………………………
IC Insights believes that the top seven or eight companies—
Samsung, “Micron-Elpida,”
TSMC, SK Hynix,
Intel, Toshiba/SanDisk, and GlobalFoundries—can be considered
an “elite” group that is just about guaranteed to be a driving force in 300mm capacity additions……………………
Meanwhile, there is still much uncertainty as to when the industry will make the next wafer-size transition—from 300mm to 450mm—and how much it will cost to do so, but momentum continues to build and the transition can now be considered certain to happen. IC manufacturers have yet to fully optimize the high-volume manufacturing cost structure for the 300mm wafer size. However, the potential per-die cost savings that the larger wafer can provide is enough of a motivating factor to make the transition happen.
http://www.icinsights.com/data/articles/...ts/516.pdf
(Comment: when it comes to 450mm wafer size, the size of the “elite” group would probably shrink further)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Agrees To Serve As Foundry For Altera FPGAs
Interestingly, Intel, the world's largest and highest valued semiconductor chip maker - that used to use its facilities for the production of its own processors only, has recently signed up Altera (Fabless) as its first foundry customer – allowing it to grow its foundry chip business and make a successful strategic shift in its business model
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsavitz/2...tera-fpgas
(Comment: another foundry choice for the increasing number of fabless players. New foundry business for Intel could potentially mean more semi-tools business for Applied Materials).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Thoughts:
It is a fact that semiconductor industry capital spending is becoming more concentrated with a greater percentage of spending coming from a shrinking number of companies – due to economic and market conditions – as Applied Materials puts it.
On one hand, more companies are moving into FABLESS, de-emphasizing building FABs for their own products and thus not building FABs for projected demand.
On the other, fewer semiconductor manufacturing companies (be it pure-play foundries such as TSMC, GlobalFoundries and UMC, or companies who FAB the majority of their own chips but also have foundry customers such as Samsung and would be new player Intel) are increasing their capex spending in larger wafer and more advanced process node to upgrade or maintain their leading edge production capabilities. – The “elite” group is getting smaller and trending towards an oligopolistic situation, if this trend continues.
The increasing number of FABLESS are increasingly DEPENDENT on a decreasingly fewer top “elite” semiconductor manufacturing companies for the production of their new chips - a trend which if continues, would shift the pricing power away from the FABLESS towards the foundry players.
Applied’s semiconductor customer base historically has been, and is becoming even more, highly concentrated as a result of these economic and industry conditions. Is this good or bad?
More good than bad I supposed – it appears that the semiconductor industry landscape is trending towards one in which many FABLESS companies are being served by a few oligopolistic semiconductor manufacturing players – who are in turn served by a few oligopolistic semiconductor EQUIPMENT manufacturers.
(Vested)
Research, research and research - Please do your own due diligence (DYODD) before you invest - Any reliance on my analysis is SOLELY at your own risk.