Posts: 3,176
Threads: 630
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
26
Value at Risk (RaV) is defined as the maximum potential change in value of a portfolio with a given probability over a certain time period.
Value at Risk measures the the potential loss in value of a portofolio over a defined period (t) for a given probability (x).
If the VaR on an asset is $ 10 million at a one-day, 5% probability level, there is only a 5% chance that the value of the asset will drop more than $ 10 million over any given day.
Or we can expect a loss of $ 10 million or more on one day in 20 days.
Posts: 2,113
Threads: 19
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
5
VaR is a statistical measurement. And like all statistical measurement, it would fail miserably when black swan kinda events happened such as 08 GFC.
IIRC, a lot of VaRs are calculated with 90 - 95% statistical confidence only.
Posts: 2,512
Threads: 24
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
19
more and more terms leads to more confusion...
1) Try NOT to LOSE money!
2) Do NOT SELL in BEAR, BUY-BUY-BUY! invest in managements/companies that does the same!
3) CASH in hand is KING in BEAR!
4) In BULL, SELL-SELL-SELL!
Posts: 1,348
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
87
i asked because i came across this term more than a few times when reading noble's AR. they claim to have a VaR of less than 1% of their equity. i'm not sure what that means. i'm trying to understand how they lost so much money on cotton one quarter ago. would the default by cotton farmers be considered such a 'black swan' event?
Posts: 2,113
Threads: 19
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
5
IIRC, Noble said the cotton default was 3-sigma event, which should be beyond the VaR control of Noble Group. I can't be certain, need some statistics expert help
Posts: 543
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
14
10-05-2012, 04:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-05-2012, 05:03 PM by shanrui_91.)
1 sigma is equals to 1 standard deviation, 3 sigma equals 3 std deviation. Using the normal distribution (bell curve), 3 std deviation from the Mean is equals to 0.26% chance of occuring
Posts: 24
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
VAR is a model that disregard the worst outcomes. For example, the 95% means that the model disregards the 10 worst day in the market. Also it assumes that there is no trending, i.e. it assumes consecutive 10 down days cannot happen. VAR does not say anything about what happen if the 10 worst days happen consecutively. For example, VAR of 1% does not describe what will be the loss if the 10 worst days of cotton price move against you. The loss can be 30% in the 10 days, for example.
In simple terms, what they are saying is, “oh don’t worry, this river is on the average only 4 feet deep, that 8 feet hole is just an outlier and it does not exist in the world of statistics, or VAR.”
VAR is usually use for position sizing, i.e. how much to trade. In addition to VAR, you need to know what is their cut loss discipline, i.e. do they cut loss at 1% or 5% or 20%.