Posts: 229
Threads: 2
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
dont do anything about it, many can see how weak our government is.
Do something about it looks like cant really help! SGX must really do a detail background check on S chip management. It will be necessary in future to declare the background of police record, private investigative background check and qualified statement from at least 3 referral (professional people who knew CEO/founder of business).
Otherwise, SGX cannot be allowed to list any S chip here!
Also a change of government has been out in the street, PAP gov got 2 years to solve a substantial amount of the outstanding case otherwise, voters will sack them! Their reputation at stake, but seems to me these days they don't care - look at the media control and you get what I mean!
Gaoxian to be relisted here - so some shldrs will still got hope!
Posts: 3,727
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation:
95
IMHO the lesson learnt from S-Chips and structural reform should be:
1) Substantial part of the CEO or Chairman net worth to be within Singapore's jurisdiction
2) Holding company incorporated in Singapore
3) Extradition treaty with China
Before you speak, listen. Before you write, think. Before you spend, earn. Before you invest, investigate. Before you criticize, wait. Before you pray, forgive. Before you quit, try. Before you retire, save. Before you die, give. –William A. Ward
Think Asset-Business-Structure (ABS)
Posts: 457
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
5
(10-07-2013, 09:25 AM)ValueBeliever Wrote: dont do anything about it, many can see how weak our government is.
Do something about it looks like cant really help! SGX must really do a detail background check on S chip management. It will be necessary in future to declare the background of police record, private investigative background check and qualified statement from at least 3 referral (professional people who knew CEO/founder of business).
Otherwise, SGX cannot be allowed to list any S chip here!
Also a change of government has been out in the street, PAP gov got 2 years to solve a substantial amount of the outstanding case otherwise, voters will sack them! Their reputation at stake, but seems to me these days they don't care - look at the media control and you get what I mean!
Gaoxian to be relisted here - so some shldrs will still got hope!
SGX in its attempt to grow earnings, have allowed many of these s**t companies to list here, to the detriment of many many retail investors. That's so sad, my dad has 30 lots in chinasky, looks like the total cost of $7,851 will go down the drain, that's easily 3 months of hard labour.
SGX, do you see how much pain you have brought to my family???
Posts: 2,278
Threads: 78
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
34
Equities of foreign based companies should be considered as a SIP so that retail investors lacking knowledge of the risk involved will not fall prey. With that being said, fraud companies are a real risk and investors shouldn't easily dismiss it.
Disclaimer: Please feel free to correct any error in my post. I am not liable for anything. Do your own research and analysis. I do NOT give buy or sell calls and stock tips. Buy and sell at your risk. I am not a qualified financial adviser so I do not give any advice. The postings reflects my own personal thoughts which may or may not be accurate.
Posts: 1,343
Threads: 49
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
7
Why are they so afraid of PRCs ?
“risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.”
I don’t look to jump over 7-foot bars: I look around for 1-foot bars that I can step over.
Posts: 591
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
5
So, in other words, the CEO is now a fugitive?
My Dividend Investing Blog
Posts: 473
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
7
(10-07-2013, 10:32 AM)specuvestor Wrote: IMHO the lesson learnt from S-Chips and structural reform should be:
1) Substantial part of the CEO or Chairman net worth to be within Singapore's jurisdiction
2) Holding company incorporated in Singapore
3) Extradition treaty with China
No. 3 is difficult if not impossible. China is one of those countries that does not extradite its own citizen to another country.
Posts: 3,727
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation:
95
(10-07-2013, 11:19 PM)touzi Wrote: (10-07-2013, 10:32 AM)specuvestor Wrote: IMHO the lesson learnt from S-Chips and structural reform should be:
1) Substantial part of the CEO or Chairman net worth to be within Singapore's jurisdiction
2) Holding company incorporated in Singapore
3) Extradition treaty with China
No. 3 is difficult if not impossible. China is one of those countries that does not extradite its own citizen to another country.
Yes difficult but China and Singapore has good relationship.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/world/....html?_r=0
Before you speak, listen. Before you write, think. Before you spend, earn. Before you invest, investigate. Before you criticize, wait. Before you pray, forgive. Before you quit, try. Before you retire, save. Before you die, give. –William A. Ward
Think Asset-Business-Structure (ABS)
Posts: 606
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
6
The Suzhou project was the pet of Oldman and got swallowed by the chinaman , now the Tianjing project also a black hole, S'pore also pretend like these projects are very successful.
Posts: 473
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
7
(11-07-2013, 11:20 AM)specuvestor Wrote: Yes difficult but China and Singapore has good relationship.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/world/....html?_r=0
Extraditing Chinese nationals, who has committed crime in China and fled overseas, back to China is what the Chinese government wants. Some cases are described in the NYT article.
Extraditing to other countries Chinese nationals who has committed crime overseas is not what they want.
Some day things may change, but this is the current stand of the Chinese government.
|
Homepage
PR Newswire
