Posts: 745
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
71
(19-08-2013, 05:38 PM)NTL Wrote: Just wondering, will there be too many ultra small investors for companies to handle when sending out letters and Annual Reports?
Many companies have already shifted to mailing CDs instead of paper reports. Most likely SGX will eventually allow electronic distribution i.e. companies can just email you the PDF instead of sending you the PDF on a CD. Right now they still have to physically send a report (but that report can be an electronic one).
---
I do not give stock tips. So please do not ask, because you shall not receive.
Posts: 2,278
Threads: 78
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
34
If I am not mistaken, while ASX do allow 1 share trading, the minimum value of any odd-lot trade must exceed A$500. Perhaps SGX could add such a criteria to prevent uneconomical accumulation of stocks which will reduce wastage - mailing of annual reports, AGM size etc.
Disclaimer: Please feel free to correct any error in my post. I am not liable for anything. Do your own research and analysis. I do NOT give buy or sell calls and stock tips. Buy and sell at your risk. I am not a qualified financial adviser so I do not give any advice. The postings reflects my own personal thoughts which may or may not be accurate.
Posts: 406
Threads: 8
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
5
One thing I like about reduced board lot size is that investor can implement constant dollar averaging investment plans more efficiently, by himself.
As for the use of electronic distribution to handle ultra small investors, another advantage is in the sending of minutes of agm. Iirc, listed companies will send minutes of agm to shareholders upon request, but at a charge of certain amount per page to cover the printing cost. If the minutes can be email to shareholders in pdf format, there is no reason to justify the per page charge.
Posts: 108
Threads: 3
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
2
This will encourage more young people with limited funds to invest. But it could be a double edged sword.
New investors may take more risks when hearing of others' success stories that investing is a get rich quick scheme, thinking that their few 100 or 1000 bucks can make them rich as long as they make the right bet or follow others.
Also, will reducing the board lot size hurt the OCBC blue chip investment and POSB invest scheme?
Patience is a virtue.
Posts: 2,512
Threads: 24
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
19
i think this is a GREAT idea finally!! and 1 lot should be able to trade by anyone!!
1) Try NOT to LOSE money!
2) Do NOT SELL in BEAR, BUY-BUY-BUY! invest in managements/companies that does the same!
3) CASH in hand is KING in BEAR!
4) In BULL, SELL-SELL-SELL!
Posts: 1,039
Threads: 14
Joined: Dec 2012
Yeah they should be like US
min 1 share trades
but also stocks should trade $1 or above
else they should be put into OTC board
just feels so stupid when investors are queuing to buy/sell digilands for 0.001
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
Since this thread is SGX related, i merged this thread into SGX thread. Please take note
Thanks
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 293
Threads: 8
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
I don't know if I am playing the devil's advocate or not. Did anyone not realise that it would increase the number of shareholders attending AGM and this might be counter productive to real discussion in the AGM? I suggest that only those holding 1000 shares and above can attend the AGM but retailers can still buy shares lesser than 1000.