19-09-2011, 07:45 PM
I found an extremely good article in Nextinsight. Link at http://www.nextinsight.net/index.php/sto...the-market. Reproduced below as well:
Written by 'ethan999'
Sunday, 18 September 2011 00:00
The writer is attracted most to China companies with significant growth potential based on domestic consumption growth. Photo in Chengdu by Leong Chan Teik
The following article by ethan999, posted yesterday on our NextInsight forum, is one of the best reader postings we have seen. It reflects the writer's insights into the reality of market dynamics and his compelling reasons for why he invests the way he does.
PERSONALLY, I never try to predict the market as a whole. There are far too many variables and unknowns involved in the market and these variables often have different degrees of effects on the stock market at different points in time.
The macro-economic picture is too complex and multi-faceted for any single individual or organization to be able to predict reliably more than 50% of the time over an extended period.
As individuals all we can do is focus on the fundamentals and financial ratios of individual stocks and ensure that we have enough cash to load up more of the companies which have fundamentals we believe in if and when the market goes down.
For example, people say that there are many problems in America and Europe. For Europe, fair enough - if you take a look at many European stock markets, they are close and some even below their March 2009 lows, meaning as low if not lower than the levels they reached during the bottom of the most severe recession since the Great Depression.
What about the Dow? Take a look at these stats (table on the right).
The Dow is essentially flat but Chinese and Singaporean stocks are down significantly?
Wait a minute, aren't all the problems in America and Europe. Now if you look at the above stats alone with no knowledge of the global macroeconomic issues, you would naturally think that there is a recession or at least a slowdown going on in Asia but that the American economy is doing just fine!
In fact economic statistics show just the opposite, that there is a slowdown and anemic growth in America, but Asia as a whole and in particular China are still growing very strongly, with China in particular growing at about 9%.
This is a great example of what I’m trying to say. First of all you cannot predict macroeconomic issues and factors because there are too many complex variables involved. Secondly, even if you could predict the complex variables, you cannot predict the precise effect it would have on the stock market.
Why with all the gloom about the West have Singaporean and Chinese stocks fallen far more than American stocks this year? Wasn’t America the one that barely managed any growth for the first half of 2011?
When the market goes down, you would naturally get many fund managers/investors telling you they are staying cautious and freed up cash. However, this seems an almost disingenuous statement because it is precisely because many fund managers and investors were bearish and have pulled out of the stock market that the stock market has gone down – this is therefore a statement after the fact.
If more fund managers/investors were more bearish, the market would have fallen even more. What’s going to happen in future with the macro-economy is always 50-50, if it was 65-35 the market would have moved in that direction, priced it in and it would be 50-50 again.
You can’t predict the market as a whole but you can analyze individual companies and their sectors/industries. What I do know is that in the long run earnings are what drive value. Take a look at these stats (table on the right).
It’s intuitive and it makes sense. Value is dependent on Return on Investment (ROI) and ROI is dependent on earnings, current plus future.
Pick the stocks which you believe have good fundamentals, low valuations, good growth potential, and in industries/sectors/countries that you like. At the same time, always keep some cash to stock up more of these companies if valuations go even lower because of global-economic headwinds.
Right now, the profile of companies that are attractive to me from a fundamental and valuation standpoint with significant growth potential is Chinese companies focused on domestic consumption growth, particularly those listed over here and some of the smaller ones in HK which are currently trading at very low valuations.
I will not use up all my cash to buy them all at once, I will always keep more cash just in case the broader market drags them down, but these are the companies I will continue to focus on now based on fundamental valuations. In the long run, they will return to fairer valuations based on earnings. If these returns to fairer valuations are accelerated due to buyouts/privatizations, as will undoubtedly be the case with some of these companies, then all the better.
Written by 'ethan999'
Sunday, 18 September 2011 00:00
The writer is attracted most to China companies with significant growth potential based on domestic consumption growth. Photo in Chengdu by Leong Chan Teik
The following article by ethan999, posted yesterday on our NextInsight forum, is one of the best reader postings we have seen. It reflects the writer's insights into the reality of market dynamics and his compelling reasons for why he invests the way he does.
PERSONALLY, I never try to predict the market as a whole. There are far too many variables and unknowns involved in the market and these variables often have different degrees of effects on the stock market at different points in time.
The macro-economic picture is too complex and multi-faceted for any single individual or organization to be able to predict reliably more than 50% of the time over an extended period.
As individuals all we can do is focus on the fundamentals and financial ratios of individual stocks and ensure that we have enough cash to load up more of the companies which have fundamentals we believe in if and when the market goes down.
For example, people say that there are many problems in America and Europe. For Europe, fair enough - if you take a look at many European stock markets, they are close and some even below their March 2009 lows, meaning as low if not lower than the levels they reached during the bottom of the most severe recession since the Great Depression.
What about the Dow? Take a look at these stats (table on the right).
The Dow is essentially flat but Chinese and Singaporean stocks are down significantly?
Wait a minute, aren't all the problems in America and Europe. Now if you look at the above stats alone with no knowledge of the global macroeconomic issues, you would naturally think that there is a recession or at least a slowdown going on in Asia but that the American economy is doing just fine!
In fact economic statistics show just the opposite, that there is a slowdown and anemic growth in America, but Asia as a whole and in particular China are still growing very strongly, with China in particular growing at about 9%.
This is a great example of what I’m trying to say. First of all you cannot predict macroeconomic issues and factors because there are too many complex variables involved. Secondly, even if you could predict the complex variables, you cannot predict the precise effect it would have on the stock market.
Why with all the gloom about the West have Singaporean and Chinese stocks fallen far more than American stocks this year? Wasn’t America the one that barely managed any growth for the first half of 2011?
When the market goes down, you would naturally get many fund managers/investors telling you they are staying cautious and freed up cash. However, this seems an almost disingenuous statement because it is precisely because many fund managers and investors were bearish and have pulled out of the stock market that the stock market has gone down – this is therefore a statement after the fact.
If more fund managers/investors were more bearish, the market would have fallen even more. What’s going to happen in future with the macro-economy is always 50-50, if it was 65-35 the market would have moved in that direction, priced it in and it would be 50-50 again.
You can’t predict the market as a whole but you can analyze individual companies and their sectors/industries. What I do know is that in the long run earnings are what drive value. Take a look at these stats (table on the right).
It’s intuitive and it makes sense. Value is dependent on Return on Investment (ROI) and ROI is dependent on earnings, current plus future.
Pick the stocks which you believe have good fundamentals, low valuations, good growth potential, and in industries/sectors/countries that you like. At the same time, always keep some cash to stock up more of these companies if valuations go even lower because of global-economic headwinds.
Right now, the profile of companies that are attractive to me from a fundamental and valuation standpoint with significant growth potential is Chinese companies focused on domestic consumption growth, particularly those listed over here and some of the smaller ones in HK which are currently trading at very low valuations.
I will not use up all my cash to buy them all at once, I will always keep more cash just in case the broader market drags them down, but these are the companies I will continue to focus on now based on fundamental valuations. In the long run, they will return to fairer valuations based on earnings. If these returns to fairer valuations are accelerated due to buyouts/privatizations, as will undoubtedly be the case with some of these companies, then all the better.
Visit my personal investing blog at http://financiallyfreenow.wordpress.com now!