(11-04-2011, 06:21 PM)Drizzt Wrote: Enterprise value =
common equity at market value
+ debt at market value
+ minority interest at market value, if any
– associate company at market value, if any
+ preferred equity at market value
– cash and cash-equivalents.
there is really not much debts. why add back liabilities when we can use market cap in that case??
All figures from 2010 Annual Report.
The debt you should be adding to this is the operating lease commitments. $19m due within the year, $24m in the next 2 to 5 years. Once you account for the operating lease commitments, FJH is no longer net cash.
To look at the replacement costs, the company carries for all the outlets all the leasehold improvements, F&B equipt, furniture at $18.56m. Very unlikely that the cost for all this would have skyrocketed. The 3 months rental deposit don't count toward the replacement cost - they would show up in the bank balances anyway.
FJH itself estimates that the life of assets is about 6 years, which seems reasonable to me. But since they didn't renovate all their outlets in 2010, there're some aging ones which are worth somewhat less. So the company puts it on its books at $9m, not $50m.
For the $5m purchase of the HK restaurant, $1.6m of it was cash, $3.5m of it was goodwill, and the rest of the fixed assets, inventories etc etc is $70k (because there were lots of liabilities). Fixed assets themselves were $171k.
Furthermore, since FJH rents (rather than owns) its premises, the replacement costs may not be realizable; so unlike a jewelry shop or steel stockist, the fixed assets would carry far less value at liquidation. If they decide to close down a restaurant / food court, the landlord could very well order them to restore it to a bare empty shell - so the leasehold improvements would be worth 0, less costs needed to tear it down.
In other words, investment value has to come from something other than the replacement costs.