ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S. › ValueBuddies.com › Personal Finance v
CPF was "100 per cent safe''

CPF was "100 per cent safe''

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HitandRun Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 634
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 22
#128
09-07-2014, 09:39 AM
Cityfarmer

One other thing that I like to highlight is I believe that the total yield of Govt funds is NOT the weighted average of GIC and Temasek's returns. The Govt also keeps idle cash in its balance sheet that actually drags down overall yield. So far Govt has been too shy to disclose this number or nobody ever asks.... I suspect this figure, i.e. net return on Govt funds, is probably within 3-5%.....
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Lancelot - 23-06-2014, 01:54 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 23-06-2014, 02:18 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 23-06-2014, 03:25 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by weijian - 23-06-2014, 04:00 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by DP28 - 23-06-2014, 04:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 23-06-2014, 05:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 23-06-2014, 11:21 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by LionFlyer - 23-06-2014, 05:33 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by weijian - 23-06-2014, 10:26 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 09:35 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 23-06-2014, 03:20 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 23-06-2014, 03:28 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by touzi - 23-06-2014, 11:34 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 09:39 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 23-06-2014, 05:37 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 09:46 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 24-06-2014, 09:38 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 24-06-2014, 11:06 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 24-06-2014, 12:29 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by investor101 - 24-06-2014, 03:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by izam - 24-06-2014, 07:38 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Zelphon - 24-06-2014, 07:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by WolfT - 24-06-2014, 08:13 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by izam - 24-06-2014, 10:53 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 24-06-2014, 11:37 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 12:37 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 24-06-2014, 03:03 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 03:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 04:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 04:29 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 03:21 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 24-06-2014, 03:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 24-06-2014, 04:43 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Lancelot - 24-06-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 04:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 24-06-2014, 05:04 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 05:10 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 24-06-2014, 05:29 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 08:46 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 24-06-2014, 09:17 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 25-06-2014, 02:42 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 25-06-2014, 01:30 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 25-06-2014, 10:08 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 05:07 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by thefarside - 25-06-2014, 08:00 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 25-06-2014, 10:34 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 25-06-2014, 10:52 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc - 25-06-2014, 04:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 25-06-2014, 04:34 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 25-06-2014, 08:13 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 11:34 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 02:07 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 03:02 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 26-06-2014, 03:27 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 03:37 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 26-06-2014, 04:19 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 03:42 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 26-06-2014, 02:23 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 03:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 03:43 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 26-06-2014, 07:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 03:54 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 27-06-2014, 02:01 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 04:12 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:03 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 04:22 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:41 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 05:02 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:33 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 04:40 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 05:14 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 05:40 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 05:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 09:42 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 02:20 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 09:33 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 26-06-2014, 10:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 10:56 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 08:31 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 08:40 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 09:33 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 09:45 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 27-06-2014, 09:54 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 10:06 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 10:22 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 10:26 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 11:13 AM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 27-06-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 27-06-2014, 09:56 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CY09 - 27-06-2014, 10:47 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 10:52 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 27-06-2014, 11:02 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 11:21 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 11:40 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 27-06-2014, 11:58 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 11:46 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by yeokiwi - 27-06-2014, 12:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 27-06-2014, 01:20 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 01:23 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 27-06-2014, 10:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 02:00 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 02:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 02:42 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CY09 - 27-06-2014, 10:44 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 28-06-2014, 12:10 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 28-06-2014, 09:43 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 28-06-2014, 11:35 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 28-06-2014, 12:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 28-06-2014, 12:27 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 28-06-2014, 12:35 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 28-06-2014, 12:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 28-06-2014, 12:59 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Porkbelly - 28-06-2014, 01:57 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 28-06-2014, 02:33 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 29-06-2014, 11:43 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 29-06-2014, 12:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Fish Head - 29-06-2014, 12:10 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 30-06-2014, 12:18 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 09-07-2014, 09:27 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 09-07-2014, 09:32 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by HitandRun - 09-07-2014, 09:39 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 09-07-2014, 10:10 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by HitandRun - 09-07-2014, 01:27 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 09-07-2014, 01:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by HitandRun - 09-07-2014, 01:53 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 09-07-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 03:45 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 09-07-2014, 04:32 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 09-07-2014, 05:04 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 04:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by nsengkia - 09-07-2014, 05:15 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 09-07-2014, 06:14 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 06:50 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by aspeed - 09-07-2014, 05:25 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 05:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 05:46 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 05:54 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 06:01 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 09-07-2014, 06:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 06:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 06:40 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by SincereKen - 26-03-2015, 01:15 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 27-03-2015, 04:23 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by vesfreq - 27-03-2015, 11:36 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by SincereKen - 01-04-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Porkbelly - 26-03-2015, 08:41 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-03-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tikam tikam - 27-03-2015, 05:50 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by SincereKen - 01-04-2015, 06:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)