CPF was "100 per cent safe''

[Temperament]

Temasek is such a small part of the Singapore government, yet, it often seems that the only income of Singapore government is from Temasek.

No. The major income of Singapore government is from tax. check the 2014 budget.

http://www.singaporebudget.gov.sg/budget...iture.aspx

Out of 59.51 billion revenue, 13 billion comes from corporate income tax, 8.8 billion from personal income tax, 10.1 billion from GST, etc.

How much does Temasek contribute to government revenue? net investment return contribution(I believe most should come from Tamesek), 8.1 billion.

Ha! Ha!
It seems our CPF's interest rate should be better soon. No? Especially it's really for our retirement and not so many other , other things like housing....etc..

Not necessary. check the expenditure of the government.

http://www.singaporebudget.gov.sg/data/b...diture.pdf

table 3.3

11.5 billion to be spent on education, 7.1 billion to be spent on health, 12.6 billion to be spent on defense, 4.2 billion to be spent on home affair and 6 billion to be spent on transport, etc.

I am not sure whether any of the major expenditure should be cut so that the CPF return should be better.

What do you think of it?

i think many local economists do not agree with the way our G does its sum. (Which can mean that our Annual GDP surplus should be more). i am quite sure of that even though you have asked me who is just "a-man-in-the street" who know nuts about how the G does its sum.
But i know the number of years of our G's GDP surplus is beyond imagination. We are that rich as far as the G is concerned.