(05-09-2012, 12:02 PM)sgd Wrote:(05-09-2012, 11:22 AM)yeokiwi Wrote:(05-09-2012, 10:28 AM)sgd Wrote: Imagine the following analogy:-The CPF member can always invest all of his OA and SA fully in properties, stocks, ETF and unit trusts.There is no need to "benefit"the state investment vehicles if the member resents it and thinks lowly of the 2.5% return.
Your father ask you to save and invest 36 per cent of your income through him. He gets 12 per cent and gives you 2.5 per cent. The excess is kept by him, and if you have an emergency and need to use it, both your father and grandfather have to approve.
In that case, the member can get a higher return by his own capability.
Is not free to do anything you like as you so describe which btw you forget to mention that one has to repay back everything in full with interest incurred back to cpf, and this will affect the final balance later to compare against the "minimum sum (TBD)" which the outcome will determine if you meet the requirement for withdraw or not.
The goal post has shifted. I am referring to the original argument that "the state investment vehicles get 12% and gives 2.5%" and the state benefits from CPF deposit. I am offering a solution to investors that resent letting the state investment vehicles getting 12% return.
Anyway, for those investors who deny the state the easy cash and gotten 12% annually, they can withdraw everything except the minimum sum at 55.