Homepage
PR Newswire
10-07-2012, 03:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2012, 03:13 PM by Temperament.)
(10-07-2012, 12:37 PM)propertyinvestor Wrote:(10-07-2012, 12:30 PM)paullow Wrote: imo, i rather go for ces. undervalued also. n going by past record they pay ard 8% yield. so in <10yrs, i would have gotten my capital back plus potential stk appreciation after a decade. whereas kb have been in 20c range for a long time. unknown when jackpot will strike while collecting coffee money of 1%+. ces more sure way to grow money.
imo. feel free to comment.
I have CES too. But in terms of potential upside, Koh Brothers seems to have more meat to feast on at current price compared to CES. I dont see CES going to 80cents, but I see Koh Brothers going to 40c.
Koh Brother's landbank is solid and as a civil engineering specialist, they earn higher margins compared to traditional residential projects.
Beware! this is counter that 'sucks your blood" since IPO. How do i know? Of course i IPOed lah! The only benefit i have is spin-off "Brothers". Even now the K. family trys to swallow Brothers. It's a blood-suckers family of DRACULA 1st Class.
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.