Uber Technologies Inc.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#47
(23-09-2017, 09:53 PM)TTTI Wrote:
(23-09-2017, 08:19 PM)Art or Science Wrote: Petition against Uber's London ban hits 500,000

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/tech...00-9244478

Uber is such a disgrace
They're lucky there isn't another app based competitor.
If Grab had a presence in London, they'd be screwed.
Nobody would petition for them as there'd be another player to take over their market share

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/20...ts-global/

Lyft probably the choice of authority, together with other smaller players.

No authority likes Uber's "GreyBall". The bigger the company, the bigger the worry to lose control. Taking drivers and regulator as partners, rather than competitors should be the way to go.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by cyclone - 10-04-2019, 12:59 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by Big Toe - 11-04-2019, 08:53 AM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by BRT - 12-04-2019, 08:10 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by cyclone - 26-04-2019, 06:45 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by brattzz - 26-04-2019, 10:46 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by cyclone - 31-05-2019, 07:11 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by cyclone - 06-12-2019, 07:55 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by cyclone - 21-01-2020, 07:42 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by weijian - 05-03-2022, 09:53 AM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by Behappyalways - 16-04-2023, 06:34 PM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by weijian - 17-04-2023, 10:12 PM
RE: At US$40 billion, Uber would eclipse Twitter and Hertz - by YMPL - 25-09-2017, 10:37 AM
Uber Technologies Inc. - by Wildreamz - 01-06-2018, 12:05 AM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by brattzz - 01-06-2018, 10:47 AM
RE: Uber Technologies Inc. - by Wildreamz - 03-06-2018, 12:49 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)