Posts: 282
Threads: 18
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
4
Trailing stop loss for myself
Posts: 13
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
0
I think for most forummers here dont use stop loss. If there is a drop of 10%, and the company is fair value/undervalue, I think most forummers would buy more instead of selling.
Posts: 820
Threads: 12
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
7
Only manually at the highest level. Which is to stop myself before buy into a stock that does not have a high enough probability of eventually giving an adequate return on investment. A.k.a itchy fingers
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
(08-09-2014, 07:21 PM)wahkao Wrote: (08-09-2014, 03:50 PM)Breadman25 Wrote: I think for most forummers here dont use stop loss. If there is a drop of 10%, and the company is fair value/undervalue, I think most forummers would buy more instead of selling.
that is average down
It depends on the definition of stop-loss. If the definition is "risk management", then value investor did it proactively, by having sufficient MOS.
If the definition is "cut losses", then maybe those previous "stop-loses" posted are not actually "stop-loss", but some thing else
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 57
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
4
Just to share my recent thinking on this topic via quantitative approach.
I am not setting Stop loss for individual counters which are normally volatile, esp small caps, but maybe it is meaningful to have trailing stop gain/loss point for the entire portfolio value. Firstly, I try to record and estimate the mean and standard deviation of monthly portfolio gain/loss, lets say 2.3%, 3.1% respectively. Secondly, by assuming the gains are normally distributed, establish the black swan event likelihood, lets say 2 standard deviation from the mean, or having a Loss more than 3.9% (2.3-3.1*2) in that month. The probability for this to happen is as small as 2.3%. (very unlikely to happen for a well diversified value portfolio in a bull market.) If it does happen, I believe it is a strong indication of a market turning point.
The critical question is whether the "one month" benchmark is too short or too long, and it depends on personal preference. IF we use 3-months mean and standard deviation of monthly portfolio gain/loss, the standard deviation will be much smaller and mean remains the same as that of one month. That means the stop criteria is more stringent in percentage term , but having less false alarms as the time frame is much longer (one need to wait until the end of the 3-months period to calculated the mean for the previous 3-months). "3-months" benchmark gives less frequent and more accurate signals, but the loss incurred during a real bear market may be much bigger than "1-month" benchmark.
In addition, other indicators may also be used to confirm or disproof the above stop loss signal, but that will be another big topic. Fire alarm system is a useful analogy.
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
I have merged the thread into an existing thread, which discussed exactly the same topic.
Please don't start new thread, if there is existing thread.
Thanks
Regards
Moderator
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡