14-05-2014, 12:05 PM
Hi lonewolf,
If CAPL wants CMA desperately, they should increase the offer and get it over and done with it. They have the money from divesting Australand. So, it is a matter of whether the long term benefits of integrating CMA into CAPL really worth paying more.
If not, then they can continue things as it is and comeback for CMA at a later date. I don't think having CMA listed will be a big problem for CAPL, just that they need to do more JVs for integrated development projects and need the hassle of getting shareholders from CMA side to agree on major transactions and/or IPTs. Afterall, CAPL already hold a controlling stake in CMA.
If CAPL wants CMA desperately, they should increase the offer and get it over and done with it. They have the money from divesting Australand. So, it is a matter of whether the long term benefits of integrating CMA into CAPL really worth paying more.
If not, then they can continue things as it is and comeback for CMA at a later date. I don't think having CMA listed will be a big problem for CAPL, just that they need to do more JVs for integrated development projects and need the hassle of getting shareholders from CMA side to agree on major transactions and/or IPTs. Afterall, CAPL already hold a controlling stake in CMA.