CNBC: 'It's a Big Moment for Japan': Fed's Bullard

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#11
I think GG has done it right.
A new thread for a new article. We can choose to read the ones we are interested, skip those we are uninterested.

GG, thanks for sharing.

(24-05-2013, 10:40 PM)greengiraffe Wrote: Sorry if I have irritated you but I thought they should be read as separate headings.

Mkt is down and everyone is affected. Sorry again.

GG

(24-05-2013, 10:32 PM)TheMillennium Wrote: Stop spamming and creating a thread for every article.

It would be better to just create one thread and put all the articles in it.
Specuvestor: Asset - Business - Structure.
Reply
#12
(25-05-2013, 06:37 PM)cyclone Wrote: I think GG has done it right.
A new thread for a new article. We can choose to read the ones we are interested, skip those we are uninterested.

GG, thanks for sharing.

(24-05-2013, 10:40 PM)greengiraffe Wrote: Sorry if I have irritated you but I thought they should be read as separate headings.

Mkt is down and everyone is affected. Sorry again.

GG

(24-05-2013, 10:32 PM)TheMillennium Wrote: Stop spamming and creating a thread for every article.

It would be better to just create one thread and put all the articles in it.

Cyclone, since you said so above,

It's ok to post numerous articles, such that it may entirely flood the front page?

I visit CNN, FT and many other websites so if I came across interesting articles can I start a thread for each and every single article I think is interesting to share it with others here?
Patience is a virtue.
Reply
#13
(25-05-2013, 07:05 PM)TheMillennium Wrote: Cyclone, since you said so above,

It's ok to post numerous articles, such that it may entirely flood the front page?

I visit CNN, FT and many other websites so if I came across interesting articles can I start a thread for each and every single article I think is interesting to share it with others here?

Dear TheMillennium,

Sure, you can share the articles, as others do.
I don't think you'd like to flood the front page, as others also don't want to.
Thanks for sharing.
Specuvestor: Asset - Business - Structure.
Reply
#14
Is it $85bil per mth?

(not $85mil)

(25-05-2013, 12:10 AM)kelvesy Wrote: I always felt that QE is a just a delay of solving the root problem. Politicians do not have the courage to make the painful decisions. Let those responsible go bankrupt, take serious losses, then start over from a sound base. Fed is adding $85mil worth of garbage monthly into its balance sheet - not the real solution.

Throughout history, it has always been the case of 'one nation falls, another nation rises'. After Second World War, USA was in its ascendancy. Now, USA on the decline, it is Asia's moment.

USA will experience negative growth in the future. They already have a bulging debt. Asia is their largest creditors. The higher the debt, the lesser competitive the country will be, and the currencies will fall. When that happens, the quality of living in USA will fall.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)