Posts: 1,733
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
31
Next year will be a hard year for Olam.
They will want to maintain EPS but using negative goodwill to boost profit is not viable anymore.
However, all their current investments will not see much profit next year.
E&Y will probably have to do a more detailed audit on Olam especially those subsidiaries that are accused by MW.
Some of the bonds are maturing next year and if Olam needs to renew them, it is going to be at an even higher interest rate.
Pending lawsuit with MW will also continue to depress the stock price.
And.. answering questions during AGM.
Posts: 1,343
Threads: 49
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
7
MW really has vital knowledge.
“risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.”
I don’t look to jump over 7-foot bars: I look around for 1-foot bars that I can step over.
Posts: 174
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
2
This being a value forum, I think most of the forummers here would have avoided Olam. Its cumulative negative cashflow since 2008 would have turned off most value investors. It is more of a growth trap than value trap. Growth-oriented investors will be attracted to Olam because of its rising profits and revenue over the years. Growth investors will be more willing to tolerate negative operating cashflow initially because of enormous upfront capital expenditure required to pursue growth in the long-term. But even then, Olam needs to bear in mind that investors will start to lose patience if operating cashflow continue to remain negative over a multi-year period and the company keep asking for more money from shareholders and bondholders.
------------------------------------
Trust yourself only with your money
Posts: 939
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
11
Does Noble Group also have large -ve FCF for many years? This company is a 10 bagger.
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
Olam call for halt again.
It is probably pending for following-up report after the initial 45 pages report.
Let's see any new update from Olam
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
(02-12-2012, 10:44 PM)hyom Wrote: This being a value forum, I think most of the forummers here would have avoided Olam. Its cumulative negative cashflow since 2008 would have turned off most value investors. It is more of a growth trap than value trap. Growth-oriented investors will be attracted to Olam because of its rising profits and revenue over the years. Growth investors will be more willing to tolerate negative operating cashflow initially because of enormous upfront capital expenditure required to pursue growth in the long-term. But even then, Olam needs to bear in mind that investors will start to lose patience if operating cashflow continue to remain negative over a multi-year period and the company keep asking for more money from shareholders and bondholders.
Very well put.
Maybe some of us like to just put a little of our money in this kind of counters. No? In anything, so as long as you know or are sure what you are doing, it is alright for me. No? Maybe after knowing so much highlights of OLAM, i may want to short it like "Muddy Water". How?
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
(03-12-2012, 10:04 AM)Temperament Wrote: (02-12-2012, 10:44 PM)hyom Wrote: This being a value forum, I think most of the forummers here would have avoided Olam. Its cumulative negative cashflow since 2008 would have turned off most value investors. It is more of a growth trap than value trap. Growth-oriented investors will be attracted to Olam because of its rising profits and revenue over the years. Growth investors will be more willing to tolerate negative operating cashflow initially because of enormous upfront capital expenditure required to pursue growth in the long-term. But even then, Olam needs to bear in mind that investors will start to lose patience if operating cashflow continue to remain negative over a multi-year period and the company keep asking for more money from shareholders and bondholders.
Very well put.
Maybe some of us like to just put a little of our money in this kind of counters. No? In anything, so as long as you know or are sure what you are doing, it is alright for me. No? Maybe after knowing so much highlights of OLAM, i may want to short it like "Muddy Water". How?
Before you proceed, let me highlight the following which you may already know
"The potential loss on a short sale is theoretically unlimited while potential gain is limited"
Take care and good luck
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 95
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
(03-12-2012, 10:22 AM)CityFarmer Wrote: (03-12-2012, 10:04 AM)Temperament Wrote: (02-12-2012, 10:44 PM)hyom Wrote: This being a value forum, I think most of the forummers here would have avoided Olam. Its cumulative negative cashflow since 2008 would have turned off most value investors. It is more of a growth trap than value trap. Growth-oriented investors will be attracted to Olam because of its rising profits and revenue over the years. Growth investors will be more willing to tolerate negative operating cashflow initially because of enormous upfront capital expenditure required to pursue growth in the long-term. But even then, Olam needs to bear in mind that investors will start to lose patience if operating cashflow continue to remain negative over a multi-year period and the company keep asking for more money from shareholders and bondholders.
Very well put.
Maybe some of us like to just put a little of our money in this kind of counters. No? In anything, so as long as you know or are sure what you are doing, it is alright for me. No? Maybe after knowing so much highlights of OLAM, i may want to short it like "Muddy Water". How?
Before you proceed, let me highlight the following which you may already know
"The potential loss on a short sale is theoretically unlimited while potential gain is limited"
Take care and good luck
Ha! Ha!
You are right! My PSY make-up does not encourages me to trade aggressively. i always lose money one. i just want to highlight anyone can make or lose money in the market in doing the same thing (short) or different thing (long).
Shalom.
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
Posts: 9,841
Threads: 711
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
64
(03-12-2012, 09:39 AM)CityFarmer Wrote: Olam call for halt again.
It is probably pending for following-up report after the initial 45 pages report.
Let's see any new update from Olam
I missed the detail in the halting announcement. It stated
"Olam is expecting to announce an initiative led by the Company involving its shareholders"
Temasek starts its move ... ?
Shortish beware...
“夏则资皮,冬则资纱,旱则资船,水则资车” - 范蠡
Posts: 1,733
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
31
03-12-2012, 12:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2012, 12:59 PM by yeokiwi.)
(03-12-2012, 12:19 PM)CityFarmer Wrote: (03-12-2012, 09:39 AM)CityFarmer Wrote: Olam call for halt again.
It is probably pending for following-up report after the initial 45 pages report.
Let's see any new update from Olam
I missed the detail in the halting announcement. It stated
"Olam is expecting to announce an initiative led by the Company involving its shareholders"
Temasek starts its move ... ?
Shortish beware...
Right issue?
If they want to shore up the balance sheet, they better do it now than later.
Or maybe some partial conditional offer by Temasek or whowever.
|