Posts: 22
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation:
1
24-03-2021, 01:48 PM
1) Management cancelled 37m TREASURY SHARES, we will see EPS improvement moving forward,
2) The Coy reported good set of 1st half year result
3) They have stopped share buy back since last July, will they increase dividend pay out in May?
Looking forward for their full year result in May, any valuebuddies interested in this stocks?
<vested>
Posts: 22
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation:
1
Indeed, the Coy has been consistently paying 1ct dividends for more than 10 years, better than bank's fixed deposit rate. They should have no issue to continue paying 1ct or more dividends since they are able to generate about yearly US$24+m free operating cash flow and at least 10 more years to go base on current contracts.
I'm just wondering why its share has been moving to no where around 25cts but the Coy and young boss bought back around 29 cts, what's this magic figure of 25cts about? Margin Of Safety? would appreciate your comments please.
Thanks
Posts: 22
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation:
1
Hi ghchua,
Thanks for your comments.
They used part of cash to buy back shares for past years, they have stopped share back since last year, hope they will use this part money to increase the dividend payout, anyway EPS with improve since they cancelled 37m treasury shares. let's wait for their full year results in May.
Posts: 45
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
3
28-05-2021, 07:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-05-2021, 07:47 PM by fallscushion.)
Going net cash soon.
Dividend cut down half to 0.5 cent, another ship acquisition is perhaps coming?
Below are definitely all hypothetical and merely personal opinions (not hard facts).
Dividend cut imho perhaps cut 3 ways:
1) Purge out shareholders who are more into chasing income & not as long term as controlling shareholder.
2) Lower price, cheaper to buy back.
3) When price is low enough, it is easier to go private (if any)
Over the past 10 years, SSC had retained over 50% of their earning (and far more from FCF, considering the deferred income).
It's just strange for Mr Market to price the company about the same as 10 years ago.
Retained earning obviously added substantial intrinsic value to the company.
Posts: 747
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
48
Hi fallscushion,
Unfortunately, the market seems to value SSC based on its yield rather than balance sheet strength. Yes, their NAV had increased throughout the years, but its share price had been mostly flat.
Ultimately, ships are still depreciating assets. The revenue and cash it can generate are limited to its useful life. Renewal of its fleet is important to keep its assets fresh so that it can continue to generate cash and dish out dividends.