Posts: 1,348
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
87
Bank fixed deposit rates are now close to 2% p.a..
Does an investment property which generates similar gross yields, still make sense?
Posts: 1,348
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
87
There could be, but loans now cost almost 2% p.a.. So if your property is leased at gross 3.0% p.a., you are only getting 1.0% p.a. in 'gross profit' terms, assuming the property is 100% financed by loans. After adding in taxes, maintenance, and depreciation of furniture, there is not likely to be much left. Maybe a net profit of 0.8% p.a. on asset value? Certainly, this 0.8% will be magnified if the returns are calculated based on your capital (or downpayment). But isn't the gross yield too low to even be considered, given the risks?
Is it unreasonable to say that property values are too high, given their gross yields and interest rates?
Posts: 731
Threads: 6
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
30
23-07-2019, 09:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-07-2019, 09:48 AM by Big Toe.)
It only makes sense for/if
i) Foreigner to diversify their investment portfolio from geo-political risks
ii) Foreigner hedge against their own home currency which may not as strong as the SGD.
iii) Your name is James Dyson and your are expanding your biz in Singapore.
iV) Very small pockets of opportunities for Office/commercial or Industrial use.
(i.e there is a slight pick up in certain segments of Industrial Properties, which had been down for 7 or 8 years at least?)
But generally speaking to invest in residential properties now for Singaporeans does not make any sense, at all.
Yields far too low, downside risks far too high.