WARNING: LONG POST
sgd Wrote:I do agree a strong Yen is not good for the Japanese economy as a whole but good for saizen shareholders in the meanwhile. Printing money to devalue will only stoke inflation. Real estate properties are good hedge against inflation.
Printing money should cause the yen price of Japanese assets to increase. It is not clear that the actual price in SGD would change. In theory, the currency should depreciate at the rate that it is being printed. In practice, the 2 rates may not be the same, and either effect could dominate for some time.
If Japan prints money slowly enough it could pay off its debts without too much currency depreciation. But this would not please the big companies. If Japan prints quickly enough to depreciate the yen significantly, other countries could follow suit, in which case all the exchange rates revert to their previous levels since all the currencies depreciate roughly the same amount.
Also, if Japan prints money too quickly it could set off hyperinflation, where the currency depreciates faster than it is being printed. This would bring about the collapse of the economy (see: Zimbabwe). Japan is still a rich country with lots of credibility among foreign investors, so this is admittedly an unlikely scenario.
So far, Japan has chosen the safe route of a slow death via deflation.
Deflation in the Japanese real estate market has meant that property values have declined for 19 years in a row. Land values are now about half of 1980s peak values. While it is true that property prices are nearer "bottom" than in the past 36 years, it is not clear just where that "bottom" is.
For the property market to bottom out and start going up, Japan must quickly return to "normal" growth rates of perhaps 2-3% per year. Given the poor demographics, this is an uphill challenge. In the short term, anything can happen. But there do not seem to be any long term catalysts for a Japanese recovery.
Japan retains a technology edge in its exports. But the Japanese giants with this technology are investing in China. Sooner or later, their technology will be transferred, sold, licensed, duplicated or simply stolen. Then what?
A lot of technology was transferred in the past to Singapore. But Singapore was too small to ever pose a threat, and the government also played nice in protecting intellectual property rights. China's manufacturing capacity far surpasses Japan's, and the Chinese government has shown little interest in protecting foreigners' intellectual property.
sgd Wrote:If you look at the singapore context, we too have a shrinking and aging problem with our population like the Japanese. Yet today our house prices are among the very high. Are our high prices really justified because of real demand or speculation hot money from quantative easing.
Just because Singapore's housing market is apparently in a bubble, doesn't make Japan's an automatic bargain.
sgd Wrote:almost every country real estate market is an overvalued hot potato except Japan which is deeply undervalued.
The Economist table referenced measures over/undervaluation with respect to "long-run average of price-to-rents ratio". A more recent table is here:
http://www.economist.com/node/17311841?s...d=17311841
According to the Economist, as of 21 Oct 2010, Japan is 35% undervalued. But the Economist's measure fundamentally assumes that the long-run average of price-to-rent ratio is rational. We know that Japanese real estate was overvalued in the 1980s. That means the price-to-rent ratio was very high i.e. not rational. For the last 19 years, property prices have been declining. Assuming rents were stable, the price-to-rent ratio has been declining. That would make Japanese property undervalued - if you assume the inflated price-to-rent ratios of the last 19 years were in fact rational.
The reality is that rents in Japan have been falling. Property prices have fallen even faster. However, Global Property Guide claims that as of Apr 2010, gross apartment rental yields in Tokyo were 5.1-6.2%. This doesn't look like a deeply undervalued market to me. Rather, it indicates how bad the bubble was, that after 19 years the yields are still not all that great.
Given the poor economy, I think rents are more likely to fall than rise. A property where the rent is falling is inherently worth less than the current yield implies, since future rents are lower before you even factor in the time value of money. So Japanese property may not really be undervalued. It could be a value trap: you buy cheap, and it gets cheaper, because returns (rents) keep going lower.
As usual, YMMV.
Current and potential Saizen REIT unitholders might find the following document interesting:
http://www.reinet.or.jp/docs/outline/toh_20100401.pdf
It is the Japan Real Estate Institute's survey of real estate investors. It is done every April and October. The April issue shows the latest cap rates and expected rent changes for various types of properties in different cities. Some things stand out:
1. Office rent expectations are basically flat or declining. The only areas expected to see rent growth are a couple of wards in Tokyo, and even then the most aggressive expectation is for rents to go up 3% in 5 years and 5% in 10 years(!).
2. Residential units in Tokyo are valued at a cap rate of about 6%. Outside Tokyo it's 7-8%.
The picture is basically one of stagnation. No meaningful economic growth expected for the next 10 years, as measured by office rents. And residential units yielding 7-8% are no bargain - this is the market rate.
Since Saizen specializes in residential units in secondary cities, on a 100% cash pass-through basis it should yield at least 7-8% if all its properties are generating free cash. Saizen's last distribution was 0.26cts, for 2 months' cashflow. Annualized, this is 1.56cts, but adjusted for warrant dilution it is 1.04cts. Against the current price of 16cts, the yield is about 6.5%.
The YK Shintoku portfolio generates no cash, but only accounts for 9% of NAV. Assuming it gets refinanced, it might add 10% to distributions. That gets us to about 1.15cts, or a yield of about 7.2% on a diluted basis.
This is what a normal, undefaulted portfolio of residential properties outside Tokyo should yield.
In other words, the price of Saizen REIT already assumes that the YK Shintoku portfolio will be refinanced i.e. there is no discount for risk. We also know that recent lease renewals have been at lower levels, 4.3% less. So future distributions from Saizen will be lower.
At the current price, unitholders are getting a current yield of 6.5-7.2% on a diluted basis, and this yield will decline in the future. There does not seem to be any margin of safety.