Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 4,917
» Latest member: shadowybs
» Forum threads: 10,219
» Forum posts: 162,549

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 471 online users.
» 3 Member(s) | 467 Guest(s)
Google, CY09, sgpianolessons, Wildreamz

Latest Threads
Yangzijiang Financial Hol...
Forum: Y - Y
Last Post: dreamybear
2 hours ago
» Replies: 250
» Views: 141,450
TAANN – another round to ...
Forum: Malaysia Listed Companies
Last Post: weijian
6 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,542
Property Market Sentiment...
Forum: Property
Last Post: weijian
7 hours ago
» Replies: 820
» Views: 1,056,097
Yoma Strategic
Forum: Y - Y
Last Post: Bibi
9 hours ago
» Replies: 69
» Views: 154,636
Luk Fook (0590)
Forum: L - L
Last Post: bmann025
11 hours ago
» Replies: 66
» Views: 106,579
Q & M Dental
Forum: Q - Q
Last Post: weijian
Yesterday, 09:39 AM
» Replies: 93
» Views: 203,204
Guan Yin Citta & Master L...
Forum: Others
Last Post: Curiousparty
27-06-2024, 11:30 PM
» Replies: 2,602
» Views: 2,668,318
Hongkong Land Holdings
Forum: H - H
Last Post: mscheng13
27-06-2024, 10:11 PM
» Replies: 73
» Views: 151,870
Capitaland Investment Man...
Forum: C - C
Last Post: weijian
27-06-2024, 08:46 PM
» Replies: 226
» Views: 404,166
Seatrium Limited (formerl...
Forum: S - S
Last Post: weijian
27-06-2024, 04:33 PM
» Replies: 348
» Views: 594,175

  What to do for privatization offers for overseas holdings?
Posted by: grubb - 05-04-2014, 01:23 AM - Forum: Others - Replies (5)

Hi all,

Has anybody participated in a privatization offer for your overseas stocks before? If the shares are acquired compulsorily then its very easy. But in the event I want to tender my shares just in case the delisting is not successful. I would like to hear about your experience and how the entire procedure is done, please.

Some of my questions are:

1) Will the company send the offer documents to my broker?

2) If broker wont send me documents and since my shares are held in my broker nominee accounts, I need to authorize my broker to accept the offer. Then how do I go about with accepting the offer?

3) Are there any extra fees that I need to pay? How much are these fees? (Some of the offer documents I have read so far mentioned transfer fees and taxes will be paid by the non-resident shareholder)

Thanks in advance!!

Print this item

  Can you share with us why Felixleong was banned ?
Posted by: safetyfirst - 04-04-2014, 04:49 PM - Forum: Others - Replies (19)

(16-11-2013, 11:40 PM)felixleong Wrote: Olam is like a whale, it needs to eat a lot via debt and rights or placement. Its businesses doesnt generate much free cash flow and their earnings are manipulated by negative good will gains, muddy water research report covers all these points in detail.

hi moderator, if you ban someone, can you tell us the reason? Generally, i dont felix's posts rude or offensive

Print this item

  S'pore woman critically injured after tour bus rolled over her lower body in HK
Posted by: pianist - 03-04-2014, 10:42 PM - Forum: Others - Replies (3)

pic 2 was terrible..must be very painful...take care


Thursday, Apr 03, 2014
http://news.asiaone.com/news/asia/spore-...-hong-kong

HONG KONG - A 25-year-old Singaporean woman was run over by a tour bus in Tsim Tsa Shui, Hong Kong, leaving her lower body seriously injured.

According to a report in Lianhe Zaobao, the bus driver did not realise that he had hit someone and continued driving forward.

The driver, a 63-year-old man surnamed Ho, only realised that he had hit someone when passers-by heard the woman yelling and frantically signalled for him to stop.

Hong Kong media reports say the woman met with the accident after 8pm at 10 Salisbury Road in Tsim Sha Tsui, close to Hong Kong Space Museum.

The woman's left foot was reportedly badly crushed while her lower body was seriously injured.

Photos taken at the scene show her being brought on board an ambulance using a stretcher with restraints.

Print this item

  The rise of the public flat as an asset
Posted by: pianist - 02-04-2014, 08:13 AM - Forum: Others - Replies (18)

Janice HengThe Straits TimesWednesday, Apr 02, 2014SINGAPORE - Public housing in some countries often takes the form of rental homes for the less well-off, such as Britain's council estates or "the projects" in the United States. Although owning such property is an option, it is not seen as the default there - unlike in Singapore. Singapore's model of home ownership allows people to buy such property as an investment which they can sell or let out. As well as being an option for those on low incomes, the public flat here is also seen as a source of income too. Yet it was not always thus. The public flat's role as an asset is one that emerged gradually. When the Housing and Development Board (HDB) was set up in 1960, its role was to provide basic permanent housing for people previously living in slums and squatter settlements. Initially, rental housing was provided but within half a decade, the HDB moved to encourage home ownership instead. Having a nation of home owners, rather than tenants, opened up more possibilities. In 1971, public flats were allowed to be resold for the first time. Previously, they could only be sold back to the HDB at fixed prices. A resale market was created and, as property prices rose, selling one's HDB flat at a profit became a possibility. Another avenue for income opened up in 2003, when HDB home owners were allowed to sublet their whole flat. Residents could upgrade to private property while letting out their HDB flat for additional income. Previously, subletting was allowed only under special circumstances, or for those aged at least 65 who had lived in three-room or smaller flats for at least 25 years. Schemes have also been set up to let elderly flat owners tap the value of their homes for retirement income. Introduced in 2009, the Lease Buyback Scheme allows people over 63 to sell part of their flat's lease back to the HDB. The proceeds go towards topping up the owners' Central Provident Fund Retirement Accounts, with any excess up to $100,000 being paid to them in cash. The Government has made it clear that its top priority is providing homes. But the role of the public flat as an asset is inescapable. As Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong put it in last year's National Day Rally speech: "The HDB programme is not just about the roof over our heads. It is also a valuable nest egg." Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories. - See more at: http://business.asiaone.com/news/the-ris...d2nq0.dpuf

Print this item

  Felix's bet on St******
Posted by: felixleong - 01-04-2014, 01:50 PM - Forum: Others - Replies (48)

(01-04-2014, 01:34 PM)yeh Wrote: i have this one quite a lot.
wonder when will this stock wake up...

value trap, good luck
will buy u coffee if it out performs the STI over say the next 5 years

Print this item

  Yeh's Portfolio
Posted by: yeh - 31-03-2014, 11:38 AM - Forum: Others - Replies (76)

i am also new bird. can help me to look at my portfolio? thanks
65 lot marco polo at 3.75
5 lot ocbc at 9.68
20 lot singtel at 3.51
45 lot stamford LD at 0.594
10 lot PEC at 0.535
20 lot Hock lian seng at 0.27
20 lot DMX tech at 0.20
8 lot St engineering at 3.81
50 share of hyflux preference share
6000 share of 3.08% capital mall bond.

thanks for your comment.

still have 50% cash to invest. can suggest what stock is good?

Print this item

  China considers launching 50 satellites to set up global monitoring network
Posted by: CityFarmer - 31-03-2014, 10:44 AM - Forum: Others - Replies (2)

The MH370 case is a real test case for "China Power", includes marine, global monitoring system etc.

IMO, the test result is disappointing to China people, but a relief among others. The "China Power" is overrated...

China considers launching 50 satellites to set up global monitoring network

KUALA LUMPUR — Frustrated over the failure to locate the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, Beijing is considering setting up a global monitoring network, the South China Morning Post reported yesterday.

The Hong Kong daily reported that Beijing was mulling over building more than 50 orbiting probes so it could monitor the entire planet.

Chinese researchers said this would put it on par with or exceed the United States in terms of having a network of surveillance and observation satellites.
...
http://www.todayonline.com/chinaindia/ch...ng-network

Print this item

  China seizes $18.3b assets from family, associates of ex-security chief Zhou Yongkang
Posted by: pianist - 30-03-2014, 08:20 PM - Forum: Others - Replies (8)

wow I tot this is quite a headline on a stiff hot sunday. any tots?

Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 18:22
reuters
BEIJING - Chinese authorities have seized assets worth at least 90 billion yuan (S$18.3 billion) from family members and associates of retired domestic security star Zhou Yongkang, who is at the centre of China's biggest corruption scandal in more than six decades, two sources said.

More than 300 of Zhou's relatives, political allies, proteges and staff have also been taken into custody or questioned in the past four months, the sources, who have been briefed on the investigation, told Reuters.

The sheer size of the asset seizures and the scale of the investigations into the people around Zhou - both unreported until now - make the corruption probe unprecedented in modern China and would appear to show that President Xi Jinping is tackling graft at the highest levels.

But it may also be driven partly by political payback after Zhou angered leaders such as Xi by opposing the ouster of former high-flying politician Bo Xilai, who was jailed for life in September for corruption and abuse of power.

Zhou, 71, has been under virtual house arrest since authorities began formally investigating him late last year. He is the most senior Chinese politician to be ensnared in a corruption investigation since the Communist Party swept to power in 1949. "It's the ugliest in the history of the New China," said one of the sources, who has ties to the leadership, requesting anonymity to avoid repercussions for speaking to the foreign media about elite politics.

The government has yet to make any official statement about Zhou or the case against him and it has not been possible to contact Zhou, his family, associates or staff for comment. It is not clear if any of them have lawyers.

The party's anti-corruption watchdog and the prosecutor's office did not respond to requests for comment. In the secretive world of China's Communist Party, targets of its investigations usually disappear, often for months or even years, until an official announcement is made.

Xi ordered a task force formed in late November or early December to look into accusations against Zhou, sources have previously told Reuters. They have not said what the allegations were except that they were related to violating party discipline, official jargon for corruption.

A third source with ties to the leadership said Zhou had refused to cooperate with investigators, insisting he was the victim of a power struggle. "Zhou Yongkang is tough and claims it's political persecution," the source said.

Zhou rose through the ranks of China's oil and gas sector before joining the elite Politburo Standing Committee in 2007, where as domestic security chief his budget exceeded defence spending. He retired in 2012 and was last seen at an alumni event at the China University of Petroleum on Oct. 1.

BONDS, VILLAS, CARS, LIQUOR, GOLD

The first two sources said prosecutors and the party's anti-corruption watchdog had frozen bank accounts with deposits totaling 37 billion yuan and seized domestic and overseas bonds and stocks with a combined value of 51 billion yuan after raiding homes in Beijing, Shanghai and five provinces.

Investigators had also confiscated about 300 apartments and villas worth around 1.7 billion yuan, antiques and contemporary paintings with a market value of 1 billion yuan and more than 60 vehicles, the sources added. Other items seized included expensive liquor, gold, silver and cash in local and foreign currencies.

The seized assets belonged to those in custody, the sources said, without saying how many people in total had been detained compared to just questioned. Most of the assets were not in Zhou's name, they added.

According to the sources, the seized assets had a combined value of at least 90 billion yuan, although it was unclear what share of that total was ill-gotten and would be turned over to the state.

The amount eventually made public could be smaller to avoid embarrassing the party and angering ordinary Chinese, the sources said.

Such asset seizures, while large, are not uncommon in China, where excess has often been revealed from graft probes in recent years. In January, the respected Chinese magazine Caixin said authorities had seized a solid gold statue of Mao Zedong among other things from the mansion of a senior military officer who has been under investigation since he was sacked in 2012.

LONG LIST

The first two sources added that more than 10 of Zhou's relatives had been detained. They included Zhou's one-time television reporter wife Jia Xiaoye, his eldest son from a previous marriage Zhou Bin, Zhou Bin's in-laws and Zhou Yongkang's brother.

About 10 officials who held a rank equivalent to at least vice minister were also under investigation, the sources said.

Among them were Jiang Jiemin, former chairman of both state energy giant PetroChina and its parent China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), former Vice Minister of Public Security Li Dongsheng and Ji Wenlin, ex-vice governor of the southernmost island province of Hainan.

Chinese state media has announced that all three were being investigated for serious violations of discipline. They were either proteges or aides to Zhou.

Reuters has been unable to contact the three men. It's unclear if they have lawyers.

More than 20 of Zhou's bodyguards, secretaries and drivers had also been detained, the sources said. Many other family members and associates had been questioned.

THE BIGGEST TIGER?

Since becoming head of the party in late 2012 and then president a year ago, Xi has vowed to go after both powerful"tigers" and lowly "flies" in an effort to crack down on the corruption he says threatens the party's very existence.

But Xi is in a dilemma over whether to put Zhou on trial lest it further undermine public faith in the party, the three sources said, referring to the growing disillusionment in China over rampant graft and abuse of power.

Xi would also risk alienating other party elders who fear that they and their families could be next, political analysts say.

Putting someone as powerful as Zhou in the dock would be a political decision that only Xi could make after getting the consensus of senior party members, Xi's predecessors and other retired top officials, they say.

In ordering the investigation, Xi broke with an unwritten rule that incumbent and retired members of the Standing Committee were immune from prosecution.

As a member of the Standing Committee, the apex of power in China, and a former domestic security chief, Zhou would have intimate knowledge of the skeletons in the party's closet.

It is still unclear exactly why Zhou has been targeted, though an early sign that he might have overstepped was when he retired and the position of domestic security chief was dropped from the Standing Committee.

Sources have also said Zhou angered Xi and other leaders over Bo Xilai, whose career was ended in 2012 by a murder scandal in which his wife was eventually convicted of poisoning a British businessman who had been a family friend.

Before Bo's downfall, Zhou had recommended that Bo succeed him as domestic security chief, multiple sources with direct knowledge of the matter have said.

Print this item

  Clock is ticking for Lavender's 'food heaven'
Posted by: kbl - 28-03-2014, 08:55 AM - Forum: Others - Replies (2)

Hawkers at Lavender Food Square will be moving out soon as the food centre and Eminent Plaza nearby are going to be redeveloped. Diners said they will miss the food centre's veritable feast at affordable prices

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-new...n-20140328

Print this item

  The truth is out: money is just an IOU, and the banks are rolling in it
Posted by: yourusualkid - 27-03-2014, 12:59 PM - Forum: Others - Replies (13)

The truth is out: money is just an IOU, and the banks are rolling in it
The Bank of England's dose of honesty throws the theoretical basis for austerity out the window

David Graeber
theguardian.com, Tuesday 18 March 2014 10.47 GMT

Back in the 1930s, Henry Ford is supposed to have remarked that it was a good thing that most Americans didn't know how banking really works, because if they did, "there'd be a revolution before tomorrow morning".

Last week, something remarkable happened. The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called "Money Creation in the Modern Economy", co-authored by three economists from the Bank's Monetary Analysis Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct. In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

To get a sense of how radical the Bank's new position is, consider the conventional view, which continues to be the basis of all respectable debate on public policy. People put their money in banks. Banks then lend that money out at interest – either to consumers, or to entrepreneurs willing to invest it in some profitable enterprise. True, the fractional reserve system does allow banks to lend out considerably more than they hold in reserve, and true, if savings don't suffice, private banks can seek to borrow more from the central bank.

The central bank can print as much money as it wishes. But it is also careful not to print too much. In fact, we are often told this is why independent central banks exist in the first place. If governments could print money themselves, they would surely put out too much of it, and the resulting inflation would throw the economy into chaos. Institutions such as the Bank of England or US Federal Reserve were created to carefully regulate the money supply to prevent inflation. This is why they are forbidden to directly fund the government, say, by buying treasury bonds, but instead fund private economic activity that the government merely taxes.

It's this understanding that allows us to continue to talk about money as if it were a limited resource like bauxite or petroleum, to say "there's just not enough money" to fund social programmes, to speak of the immorality of government debt or of public spending "crowding out" the private sector. What the Bank of England admitted this week is that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary: "Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits" … "In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank money 'multiplied up' into more loans and deposits."

In other words, everything we know is not just wrong – it's backwards. When banks make loans, they create money. This is because money is really just an IOU. The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of taxes. There's really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it. They will never get caught short, for the simple reason that borrowers do not, generally speaking, take the cash and put it under their mattresses; ultimately, any money a bank loans out will just end up back in some bank again. So for the banking system as a whole, every loan just becomes another deposit. What's more, insofar as banks do need to acquire funds from the central bank, they can borrow as much as they like; all the latter really does is set the rate of interest, the cost of money, not its quantity. Since the beginning of the recession, the US and British central banks have reduced that cost to almost nothing. In fact, with "quantitative easing" they've been effectively pumping as much money as they can into the banks, without producing any inflationary effects.

What this means is that the real limit on the amount of money in circulation is not how much the central bank is willing to lend, but how much government, firms, and ordinary citizens, are willing to borrow. Government spending is the main driver in all this (and the paper does admit, if you read it carefully, that the central bank does fund the government after all). So there's no question of public spending "crowding out" private investment. It's exactly the opposite.

Why did the Bank of England suddenly admit all this? Well, one reason is because it's obviously true. The Bank's job is to actually run the system, and of late, the system has not been running especially well. It's possible that it decided that maintaining the fantasy-land version of economics that has proved so convenient to the rich is simply a luxury it can no longer afford.

But politically, this is taking an enormous risk. Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realised the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand which we, the public, handed over to it.

Historically, the Bank of England has tended to be a bellwether, staking out seeming radical positions that ultimately become new orthodoxies. If that's what's happening here, we might soon be in a position to learn if Henry Ford was right.



http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree...rity/print

Print this item