(26-05-2016, 08:21 AM)weijian Wrote: A look at his 1985-2005 (20years) show his fund's CAGR of 2.1% vs S&P500 of 12.7%. It is indeed not easy to be a perma short, since markets rise with GDP (and the world progressing) over the long term.
Interesting, JC's annual returns are highly negatively correlated to the S&P500. It falls along his proposal that his fund is for those who wishes to buy insurance in a bull market. One could consider it a hedge. It might be more profitable investing in his fund than spending some of those on put options instead?
http://www.valuewalk.com/wp-content/uplo...mance1.pdf
Nonetheless, it is indeed lonely to be a perma short. Their make-up is interesting for value investors. While I don't short (and don't see myself doing that in future, for now), I think Jim Chanos's stuff is a treasure cove for me to learn.
Thank you for the link.
I do occasionally short, mainly by buying put options.
I think hedging by buying put options would be much better than investing in his fund for the simple reason that you can control what you're shorting, or if you wish to, you can just simply short the S&P500, whereas you cant control what JC shorts.
He has had more misses than hits generally, but is famed and highly sought after for his opinions after a few high profile shorts turned out well.
On top of that, if you add in the fees and other costs, it's clear that buying your own options would be a better option.